Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;54(9):4020-5.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01240-09. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

Successful treatment for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and importance of follow-up

Affiliations

Successful treatment for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and importance of follow-up

F P N Mollema et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

With this prospective observational follow-up study of 165 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-positive individuals (23 health care workers and 142 patients), we determined that our MRSA eradication therapy protocol results in a high success rate (81%). Five or more negative culture sets give a predictive value for MRSA eradication therapy success of >90%. Furthermore, MRSA colonization, at least in the throat, and the presence of wounds just before the start of MRSA eradication therapy are associated with MRSA eradication therapy failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Flowchart demonstrating the outcomes for MRSA-positive individuals after the first detection of MRSA. Unsuccessful treatment was defined as one or more cultures positive in one or more out of six consecutive follow-up culture sets (e.g., nose, throat, perineum, and any wounds or skin lesions present). *, patients not included because either (i) there was no treatment in our hospital (n, 26), (ii) they were not eligible for treatment (due to relative contraindications for eradication therapy, loss to follow-up after the first MRSA detection, or a high risk of noncompliance with treatment) (n, 17), or (iii) they died before treatment could be offered (n, 12). ¥, no new MRSA eradication therapy because of newly arisen relative contraindications for eradication therapy (n, 7), unavailability of new therapy in our hospital (n, 1); or loss to follow-up (n, 1). †, no new MRSA eradication therapy because of newly arisen relative contraindications for eradication therapy (n, 4). ‡, not included in the intention-to-treat analysis.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Number of MRSA-negative swabs needed to predict the success of MRSA eradication therapy as measured with 36 individuals whose MRSA eradication therapy failed.

References

    1. Adra, M., and K. R. Lawrence. 2004. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for treatment of severe Staphylococcus aureus infections. Ann. Pharmacother. 38:338-341. - PubMed
    1. Ammerlaan, H. S., J. A. Kluytmans, H. F. Wertheim, J. L. Nouwen, and M. J. Bonten. 2009. Eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage: a systematic review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48:922-930. - PubMed
    1. Batra, R., A. C. Eziefula, D. Wyncoll, and J. Edgeworth. 2008. Throat and rectal swabs may have an important role in MRSA screening of critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 34:1703-1706. - PubMed
    1. Boyce, J. M. 1989. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Detection, epidemiology, and control measures. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 3:901-913. - PubMed
    1. Boyce, J. M., N. L. Havill, and B. Maria. 2005. Frequency and possible infection control implications of gastrointestinal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5992-5995. - PMC - PubMed

Substances