Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Apr;65(2):181-96.

Optimal surgical treatment of locally advanced low rectal cancer

Affiliations
  • PMID: 20548274
Review

Optimal surgical treatment of locally advanced low rectal cancer

D Liska et al. Minerva Chir. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Colorectal adenocarcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Western countries. Rectal cancer comprises approximately 25% of the malignancies arising in the large bowel. However, the past two decades have seen many major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. While surgery is still the cornerstone of curative therapy, a multidisciplinary approach including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has resulted in significantly improved outcomes. Information concerning the T, N, M stage and the exact location of tumor in relation to the anal verge are of crucial importance when planning a curative rectal cancer resection. Preoperative staging, utilizing a combination of diagnostic modalities, must be undertaken to determine whether or not neoadjuvant therapy is indicated. In radical resection of locally advanced low rectal cancer, several unique surgical management issues should be considered: 1) total mesorectal excision (TME); 2) longitudinal and circumferential resection margins; 3) autonomic nerve preservation (ANP); 4) sphincter preservation versus abdominoperineal resection (APR); 5) restoration of bowel continuity; and 6) laparoscopic versus open resection. The surgeon must first strive to achieve an oncologic cure, but whenever possible this should be undertaken with the goal of maintaining the patient's quality of life. The purpose of this review is to outline the critical surgical issues involved in management of locally advanced low rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO).
    Xynos E, Tekkis P, Gouvas N, Vini L, Chrysou E, Tzardi M, Vassiliou V, Boukovinas I, Agalianos C, Androulakis N, Athanasiadis A, Christodoulou C, Dervenis C, Emmanouilidis C, Georgiou P, Katopodi O, Kountourakis P, Makatsoris T, Papakostas P, Papamichael D, Pechlivanides G, Pentheroudakis G, Pilpilidis I, Sgouros J, Triantopoulou C, Xynogalos S, Karachaliou N, Ziras N, Zoras O, Souglakos J; [the Executive Team on behalf of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO)]. Xynos E, et al. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):103-26. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0003. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27064746 Free PMC article.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources