Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;14(1):10-20.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00604.x.

Health professionals, patients and chronic illness policy: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Health professionals, patients and chronic illness policy: a qualitative study

Laurann Yen et al. Health Expect. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background and objective: This study investigates health professionals' reactions to patients' perceptions of health issues - a little-researched topic vital to the reform of the care of chronic illness.

Methods: Focus groups were undertaken with doctors, nurses, allied health staff and pharmacists (n = 88) in two Australian urban regions. The focus groups explored responses to patient experiences of chronic illness (COPD, Diabetes, CHF) obtained in an earlier qualitative study. Content analysis was undertaken of the transcripts assisted by NVivo7 software.

Results: Health professionals and patients agreed on general themes: that competing demands in self-management, financial pressure and co-morbidity were problems for people with chronic illness. However where patients and carers focused on their personal challenges, health professionals often saw the patient experience as a series of failures relating to compliance or service fragmentation. Some saw this as a result of individual shortcomings. Most identified structural and attitudinal issues. All saw the prime solution as additional resources for their own activities. Fee for service providers (mainly doctors) sought increased remuneration; salaried professionals (mainly nurses and allied health professionals) sought to increase capacity within their professional group.

Conclusions: Professionals focus on their own resources and the behaviour of other professionals to improve management of chronic illness. They did not factor information from patient experience into their views about systems improvement. This inability to identify solutions beyond their professional sphere highlights the limitations of an over-reliance on the perspectives of health professionals. The views of patients and carers must find a stronger voice in health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oldroyd J, Proudfoot J, Infante FA, et al. Providing healthcare for people with chronic illness: the views of Australian GPs. Medical Journal of Australia, 2003; 179: 30–33. - PubMed
    1. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Affairs, 2009; 28: 75–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Health Priority Action Council (NHPAC) National Chronic Disease Strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006.
    1. National Health Priority Action Council (NHPAC) National Service Improvement Framework for Diabetes. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006.
    1. Harris MF, Zwar NA. Care of patients with chronic disease: the challenge for general practice. Medical Journal of Australia, 2007; 187: 104–107. - PubMed

Publication types