Nurses' attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature
- PMID: 20550639
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00669.x
Nurses' attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature
Abstract
Seclusion is now widely recognized as a coercive strategy with negative consequences for the consumers and staff involved. Nevertheless, this intervention continues to be used frequently in mental health services internationally. Due to their direct care role, nurses are commonly involved in the initiation or management of seclusion. Understanding nurses' attitudes to seclusion is therefore essential for the success of any attempts to reduce its use. A review of the literature was conducted using the search terms 'patient', 'seclusion', 'attitudes', 'nurses' and 'containment'. Twenty-eight articles which met the inclusion criteria were identified. Analysis of these articles identified six main themes: a necessary intervention; workplace culture; staff composition and experience; conflict; ethical considerations; and consumer characteristics. An overview of the literature is presented according to these main themes. The research suggests that most nurses support the continued use of seclusion as a strategy for the management of violence and aggression. A deeper understanding of the factors that influence attitudes is necessary if seclusion rates are to be effectively reduced.
Comment in
-
Epistemic injustice and the mental health service user.Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Jun;19(3):151-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00680.x. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010. PMID: 20550637 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective.Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Sep;25(6):559-78. doi: 10.1080/01612840490472101. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004. PMID: 15371143
-
On conflict, containment and the relationship between them.Nurs Inq. 2006 Sep;13(3):172-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2006.00319.x. Nurs Inq. 2006. PMID: 16918784 Review.
-
Restraint and seclusion: a distressing treatment option?J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Sep;16(7):599-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01419.x. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19689553
-
Seclusion as a necessary intervention: the relationship between burnout, job satisfaction and therapeutic optimism and justification for the use of seclusion.J Adv Nurs. 2011 Jun;67(6):1222-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05570.x. Epub 2011 Jan 24. J Adv Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21261695
-
Nurse on nurse.Nurs Forum. 2007 Jul-Sep;42(3):123-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00076.x. Nurs Forum. 2007. PMID: 17661804 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):733-746. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x. Psychiatr Q. 2018. PMID: 29527618
-
Development of the Japanese version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 17;13:1026676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1026676. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 36325534 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Nurses' and Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Coercive and Technological Measures in Mental Health: A Conceptual Framework and Study Protocol.Nurs Rep. 2024 Dec 20;14(4):4129-4144. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040301. Nurs Rep. 2024. PMID: 39728662 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes Toward Coercion Among Mental Healthcare Workers in Italy: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 12;13(14):1680. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141680. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40724705 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' perspectives on human rights when coercion is used in psychiatry: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence.Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 9;8(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1224-0. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31815660 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous