Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;7(4):A79.
Epub 2010 Jun 15.

Smoke-free law associated with higher-than-expected taxable retail sales for bars and taverns in Washington State

Myde Boles  1 , Julia Dilley, Julie E Maher, Michael J Boysun, Terry Reid
Affiliations

Smoke-free law associated with higher-than-expected taxable retail sales for bars and taverns in Washington State

Myde Boles et al. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Continued progress in implementing smoke-free laws throughout the United States would benefit from documenting positive economic effects, particularly for the hospitality industry. This study describes changes in sales revenue in bars and taverns since December 2005, when a statewide smoke-free law in Washington State went into effect.

Methods: Using 24 quarters of inflation-adjusted taxable retail sales data from 2002 through 2007, we fitted a regression model to estimate the effect of the smoke-free law on sales revenue, controlling for seasonality and other economic factors.

Results: We found no immediate change in bar revenues in the first quarter of 2006, but taxable retail sales grew significantly through the fourth quarter of 2007. In the 2 years after the smoke-free law was implemented, sales revenues were $105.5 million higher than expected for bars and taverns in Washington State.

Conclusion: The higher-than-expected revenue from taxable sales in bars and taverns after the implementation of smoke-free laws in Washington State provided extra funds to the state general fund. Potential increases in revenue in other jurisdictions that implement smoke-free indoor air policies could provide funds to benefit residents of those jurisdictions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Line graph
Figure.
Predicted values from a regression model predicting taxable retail sales (TRS) in bars and taverns in Washington State after the implementation of a smoke-free law, from the fourth quarter of 2005 (Q4:2005) through the fourth quarter of 2007 (Q4:2007). Values are adjusted for seasonality, unemployment, and personal income from 2002 through 2007 (data before Q4:2005 are not shown).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Overview list – how many smokefree laws? Berkeley (CA): American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation; 2009. [Accessed August 23, 2009]. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/mediaordlist.pdf .
    1. Eriksen M, Chaloupka F. The economic impact of clean indoor air laws. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(6):367–378. - PubMed
    1. Scollo M, Lal A, Hyland A, Glantz S. Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tob Control. 2003;12(1):13–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scollo M, Lal A. Summary of studies assessing the economic impact of smoke-free policies in the hospitality industry — includes studies produced to 31 January 2008. Carlton, Victoria (CA): VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control; [Accessed September 2, 2009]. 2008. http://www.vctc.org.au/tc-res/Hospitalitysummary.pdf .
    1. Glantz SA, Smith LR. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants on restaurant sales. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1081–1085. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances