Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: status and perspectives
- PMID: 20551011
- PMCID: PMC2956231
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1281
Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: status and perspectives
Abstract
Background: Use of the Internet for health purposes is steadily increasing in Europe, while the eHealth market is still a niche. Online communication between doctor and patient is one aspect of eHealth with potentially great impact on the use of health systems, patient-doctor roles and relations and individuals' health. Monitoring and understanding practices, trends, and expectations in this area is important, as it may bring invaluable knowledge to all stakeholders, in the Health 2.0 era.
Objective: Our two main goals were: (1) to investigate use of the Internet and changes in expectations about future use for particular aspects of communication with a known doctor (obtaining a prescription, scheduling an appointment, or asking a particular health question), and (2) to investigate how important the provision of email and Web services to communicate with the physician is when choosing a new doctor for a first time face-to-face appointment. The data come from the second survey of the eHealth Trends study, which addressed trends and perspectives of health-related Internet use in Europe. This study builds on previous work that established levels of generic use of the Internet for self-help activities, ordering medicine or other health products, interacting with a Web doctor/unknown health professional, and communicating with a family doctor or other known health professional.
Methods: A representative sample of citizens from seven European countries was surveyed (n = 7022) in April and May of 2007 through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents were questioned about their use of the Internet to obtain a prescription, schedule an appointment, or ask a health professional about a particular health question. They were also asked what their expectations were regarding future use of the Internet for health-related matters. In a more pragmatic approach to the subject, they were asked about the perceived importance when choosing a new doctor of the possibility of using email and the Web to communicate with that physician. Logistic regression analysis was used to draw the profiles of users of related eHealth services in Europe among the population in general and in the subgroup of those who use the Internet for health-related matters. Changes from 2005 to 2007 were computed using data from the first eHealth Trends survey (October and November 2005, n = 7934).
Results: In 2007, an estimated 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 - 2.1) of the population in these countries had used the Internet to request or renew a prescription; 3.2% (95% CI 2.8 - 3.6) had used the Internet to schedule an appointment; and 2.5% (95% CI 2.2 - 2.9) had used the Internet to ask a particular health question. This represents estimated increases of 0.9% (95% CI 0.5 - 1.3), 1.7% (95% CI 1.2 - 2.2), and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9 - 1.8). An estimated 18.0% (95% CI 17.1 - 18.9) of the populations of these countries expected that in the near future they would have consultations with health professionals online, and 25.4% (95% CI 24.4 - 26.3) expected that in the near future they would be able to schedule an appointment online. Among those using the Internet for health-related purposes, on average more than 4 in 10 people considered the provision of these eHealth services to be important when choosing a new doctor.
Conclusions: Use of the Internet to communicate with a known health professional is still rare in Europe. Legal context, health policy issues, and technical conditions prevailing in different countries might be playing a major role in the situation. Interest in associated eHealth services is high among citizens and likely to increase.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared
Similar articles
-
eHealth trends in Europe 2005-2007: a population-based survey.J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 17;10(4):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1023. J Med Internet Res. 2008. PMID: 19017584 Free PMC article.
-
Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey.BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Apr 16;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-20. BMC Fam Pract. 2011. PMID: 21496309 Free PMC article.
-
European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries.BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 10;7:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53. BMC Public Health. 2007. PMID: 17425798 Free PMC article.
-
The Antecedents and Consequences of Health Care Professional-Patient Online Interactions: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e13940. doi: 10.2196/13940. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31573908 Free PMC article.
-
Web-Based Tools for Text-Based Patient-Provider Communication in Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 27;19(10):e366. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7987. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 29079552 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Factors Associated With Online Patient-Provider Communications Among Cancer Survivors in the United States During COVID-19: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR Cancer. 2023 May 22;9:e44339. doi: 10.2196/44339. JMIR Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37074951 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Advice Seekers' Need Salience and Doctors' Communication Style on Attitude and Decision Making: A Web-Based Mammography Consultation Role Play.JMIR Cancer. 2015 Sep 8;1(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/cancer.4279. JMIR Cancer. 2015. PMID: 28410160 Free PMC article.
-
Web-Based Medical Appointment Systems: A Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 26;19(4):e134. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6747. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28446422 Free PMC article.
-
Collaborative learning about e-health for mental health professionals and service users in a structured anonymous online short course: pilot study.BMC Med Educ. 2012 May 31;12:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-37. BMC Med Educ. 2012. PMID: 22651553 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' motives for professional internet use and differences in attitudes toward the internet-informed patient, physician-patient communication, and prescribing behavior.Med 2 0. 2012 Jul 6;1(2):e2. doi: 10.2196/med20.1996. eCollection 2012 Jul-Dec. Med 2 0. 2012. PMID: 25075230 Free PMC article.
References
-
- CPME/SCED, authors. On information to patients and patient empowerment. Comité Permanent des Médicins Européens/Standing Committee of European Doctors. 2004 Sep 11;
-
- Hughes Benjamin, Joshi Indra, Wareham Jonathan. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1056. http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e23/v10i3e23 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0 Congress website launched (and Definition of Medicine 2.0 / Health 2.0) Gunther Eysenbach’s Random Research Rants. 2008;http 5jIpJtefx http://gunther-eysenbach.blogspot.com/2008/03/medicine-20-congress-websi....
-
- Car Josip, Sheikh Aziz. Email consultations in health care: 1--scope and effectiveness. BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):435–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.435. http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15321902329/7463/435 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Baker Laurence, Rideout Jeffrey, Gertler Paul, Raube Kristiana. Effect of an Internet-based system for doctor-patient communication on health care spending. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):530–6. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1778. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid...M1778 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous