When meaning matters, look but don't touch: the effects of posture on reading
- PMID: 20551336
- DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.5.555
When meaning matters, look but don't touch: the effects of posture on reading
Abstract
Much of the reading that we do occurs near our hands. Previous research has revealed that spatial processing is enhanced near the hands, potentially benefiting several processes involved in reading; however, it is unknown whether semantic processing--another critical aspect of reading--is affected near the hands. While holding their hands either near to or far from a visual display, our subjects performed two tasks that drew on semantic processing: evaluation of the sensibleness of sentences, and the Stroop color-word interference task. We found evidence for impoverished semantic processing near the hands in both tasks. These results suggest a trade-off between spatial processing and semantic processing for the visual space around the hands. Readers are encouraged to be aware of this trade-off when choosing how to read a text, since both kinds of processing can be beneficial for reading.
Similar articles
-
Is semantic processing impaired near the hands?Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Nov;221:103443. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103443. Epub 2021 Oct 30. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021. PMID: 34739901
-
On the relationship between spatial attention and semantics in the context of a Stroop paradigm.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1521-1530. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02911-9. Epub 2024 Jun 17. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 38886301
-
Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Dec;84(3):213-29. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90061-u. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993. PMID: 8128904
-
Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin.Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):987-99. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.987. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009. PMID: 19966248 Review.
-
Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):721-733. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1167-6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 27714665 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Interacting hands: the role of attention for the joint Simon effect.Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 17;5:1462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01462. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25566140 Free PMC article.
-
Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space.Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):677-84. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0680-y. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Psychol Res. 2016. PMID: 26134543
-
Attention's grasp: early and late hand proximity effects on visual evoked potentials.Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 12;4:420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00420. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23874315 Free PMC article.
-
Task demands determine hand posture bias on conflict processing in a Simon task.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):579-86. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0901-9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 26174576
-
Opposing influences of global and local stimulus-hand proximity on crosstalk interference in dual tasks.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2461-2478. doi: 10.1177/17470218231157548. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023. PMID: 36765279 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical