Accuracy of live fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal epidural injections
- PMID: 20552068
- PMCID: PMC2884208
- DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2010.23.1.18
Accuracy of live fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal epidural injections
Abstract
Background: Complications following lumbar transforaminal epidural injection are frequently related to inadvertent vascular injection of corticosteroids. Several methods have been proposed to reduce the risk of vascular injection. The generally accepted technique during epidural steroid injection is intermittent fluoroscopy. In fact, this technique may miss vascular uptake due to rapid washout. Because of the fleeting appearance of vascular contrast patterns, live fluoroscopy is recommended during contrast injection. However, when vascular contrast patterns are overlapped by expected epidural patterns, it is hard to distinguish them even on live fluoroscopy.
Methods: During 87 lumbar transforaminal epidural injections, dynamic contrast flows were observed under live fluoroscopy with using digital subtraction enhancement. Two dynamic fluoroscopy fluoroscopic images were saved from each injection. These injections were performed by five physicians with experience independently. Accuracy of live fluoroscopy was determined by comparing the interpretation of the digital subtraction fluoroscopic images.
Results: Using digital subtraction guidance with contrast confirmation, the twenty cases of intravascular injection were found (the rate of incidence was 23%). There was no significant difference in incidence of intravascular injections based either on gender or diagnosis. Only five cases of intravascular injections were predicted with either flash or aspiration of blood (sensitivity = 25%). Under live fluoroscopic guidance with contrast confirmation to predict intravascular injection, twelve cases were predicted (sensitivity = 60%).
Conclusions: This finding demonstrate that digital subtraction fluoroscopic imaging is superior to blood aspiration or live fluoroscopy in detecting intravascular injections with lumbar transforaminal epidural injection.
Keywords: digital subtraction image; epidural injection; fluoroscopy; intravascular injection.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Accuracy of intermittent fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural injections.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 1;33(7):E205-10. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816960fe. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008. PMID: 18379390
-
Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):21-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00007. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12544950
-
Incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection during lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections.Spine J. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.380. Epub 2006 Nov 28. Spine J. 2007. PMID: 17197337 Clinical Trial.
-
Digital Subtraction Angiography Use During Epidural Steroid Injections Does Not Reliably Distinguish Artery from Vein.Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):255-66. Pain Physician. 2016. PMID: 27228513 Review.
-
Image Guidance Technologies for Interventional Pain Procedures: Ultrasound, Fluoroscopy, and CT.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Jan 26;22(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0660-1. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018. PMID: 29374352 Review.
Cited by
-
Advantages of digital subtraction angiography during nerve block.Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Nov 20;4(5):e19927. doi: 10.5812/aapm.19927. eCollection 2014 Dec. Anesth Pain Med. 2014. PMID: 25793174 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of incidence of intravascular injections during transforaminal epidural steroid injection using different needle types.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Sep;67(3):193-7. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.3.193. Epub 2014 Sep 24. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014. PMID: 25302096 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection.Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:6426802. doi: 10.1155/2017/6426802. Epub 2017 Apr 13. Pain Res Manag. 2017. PMID: 28490942 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Whitacre needle and Chiba needle on the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal epidural injections: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 18;99(51):e23665. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023665. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33371104 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Digital subtraction angiography vs. real-time fluoroscopy for detection of intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural block.Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2019 May;36(2):109-114. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2019.00122. Epub 2019 Jan 24. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2019. PMID: 31620622 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, Schultz DM, Hansen HC, Abdi S, et al. Interventional techniques: evidence based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2007;10:7–111. - PubMed
-
- Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Smith HS. Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2009;12:233–251. - PubMed
-
- Marshall LL, Trethewie ER, Curtain CC. Chemical radiculitis: a clinical, physiological and immunological study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;129:61–67. - PubMed
-
- Wheeler AH, Murrey DB. Chronic lumbar spine and radicular pain: pathophysiology and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2002;6:97–105. - PubMed
-
- Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Bogduk N, Zindrick MR. The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1261–1270. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources