Workplace substance-use norms as predictors of employee substance use and impairment: a survey of U.S. workers
- PMID: 20553660
- PMCID: PMC2887922
- DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.526
Workplace substance-use norms as predictors of employee substance use and impairment: a survey of U.S. workers
Abstract
Objective: Although much research has explored the relation of substance-use norms to substance use among college students, much less research has focused on employed adults and the workplace as a social context for social norms regarding substance use. This study explored the relation of descriptive and injunctive workplace substance-use norms regarding alcohol and illicit drug use to employee substance use. Both alcohol use and illicit drug use were explored, as well as overall and context-specific use and impairment.
Method: Data were collected from a national probability sample of 2,430 employed adults (55% female) using a random-digit-dial telephone survey. Overall employee alcohol and illicit drug use were assessed, as well as use before work, use and impairment during the workday, and use after work.
Results: After controlling for a number of potential covariates, injunctive norms regarding workplace alcohol and illicit drug use predicted substance use and impairment overall and across all contexts of use. Descriptive norms predicted alcohol and illicit drug use before and during work, as well as workplace impairment.
Conclusions: This study shows that both workplace injunctive and descriptive norms are important predictors of substance use in the U.S. workforce. There were two general patterns, however, that were consistent across both alcohol and illicit drug use. Social norms marketing campaigns, therefore, may be a useful way for employers to target employee substance use. The present results also helped to integrate the results of several prior studies that employed narrower samples and measures.
Similar articles
-
Does a permissive workplace substance use climate affect employees who do not use alcohol and drugs at work? A U.S. national study.Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Jun;23(2):386-90. doi: 10.1037/a0015965. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009. PMID: 19586158 Free PMC article.
-
Relation of supervisor social control to employee substance use: considering the dimensionality of social control, temporal context of substance use, and substance legality.J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Mar;73(2):303-10. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.303. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012. PMID: 22333338 Free PMC article.
-
Workplace Substance Use Climate: Prevalence and Distribution in the U.S. Workforce.J Subst Use. 2012 Feb 1;71(1):72-83. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2010.531630. J Subst Use. 2012. PMID: 23258960 Free PMC article.
-
Substance abuse in the workplace: epidemiology, effects, and industry response.Occup Med. 2002 Jan-Mar;17(1):13-25, iii. Occup Med. 2002. PMID: 11726333 Review.
-
Workplace Policies and Programs Concerning Alcohol and Drug Use.2014 Aug 7. In: The CBHSQ Report. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2013–. 2014 Aug 7. In: The CBHSQ Report. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2013–. PMID: 27606403 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Structural sexism moderates work and occupational risks for alcohol consumption and binge drinking among US women, 1989-2016.Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;324:115878. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115878. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Soc Sci Med. 2023. PMID: 37003025 Free PMC article.
-
Swedish Managers' and HR-Officers' Experiences and Perceptions of Participating in Alcohol Prevention Skills Training: A Qualitative Study.Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 3;13:756343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.756343. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35310249 Free PMC article.
-
Bi+ Men's Explanations for Substance Use Disparities in Their Community.J Bisex. 2024;24(4):449-470. doi: 10.1080/15299716.2024.2370530. Epub 2024 Jul 10. J Bisex. 2024. PMID: 39850844 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the use of workplaces to recruit "hard-to-reach" male drinkers to a survey on alcohol use and awareness of health messages.BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;21(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10697-w. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33789645 Free PMC article.
-
When the party continues: Impulsivity and the effect of employment on young adults' post-college alcohol use.Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;77:114-120. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 28. Addict Behav. 2018. PMID: 28992576 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ames GM, Grube JW, Moore RS. Social control and workplace drinking norms: A comparison of two organizational cultures. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2000;61:203–219. - PubMed
-
- Ames GM, Janes CJ. A cultural approach to conceptualizing alcohol and the workplace. Alcohol Health and Research World. 1992;16:112–119.
-
- Bacharach SB, Bamberger PA, Sonnenstuhl WJ. Driven to drink: Managerial control, work-related risk factors, and employee problem drinking. Academy of Management Journal. 2002;45:637–658.
-
- Borsari B, Carey KB. Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse. 2001;13:391–424. - PubMed