Cognitive testing of pigs (Sus scrofa) in translational biobehavioral research
- PMID: 20553757
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.05.004
Cognitive testing of pigs (Sus scrofa) in translational biobehavioral research
Abstract
Within neuroscience and biobehavioral research, the pig (Sus scrofus) is increasingly being acknowledged as a valuable large animal species. Compared to the rodent brain, the pig brain more closely resembles the human brain in terms of both anatomy and biochemistry, which associates the pig with a higher translational value. Several brain disorders have been fully or partially modeled in the pig and this has further spurred an interest in having access to behavioral tasks for pigs, and in particular to cognitive tasks. Cognitive testing of pigs has been conducted for several years by a small group of farm animal welfare researchers, but it has only recently received interest in the wider neuroscience community. Several behavioral tasks have successfully been adapted to the pig, and valuable results have been produced. However, most tasks have only been established at a single research facility, and would benefit from further validation. This review presents the cognitive tasks that have been developed for pigs, their validation, and their current use.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The use of pigs in neuroscience: modeling brain disorders.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(5):728-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Mar 4. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007. PMID: 17445892
-
Assessing learning and memory in pigs.Anim Cogn. 2011 Mar;14(2):151-73. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0364-3. Epub 2011 Jan 4. Anim Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21203792 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Animal cognition: defining the issues.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Nov;28(7):645-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.005. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004. PMID: 15555674 Review.
-
[Cognitive enrichment in zoo and farm animals--implications for animal behaviour and welfare].Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2010 Nov-Dec;123(11-12):446-56. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2010. PMID: 21141273 German.
-
A comparison of two cognitive test paradigms in a penetrating brain injury model.J Neurosci Methods. 2010 May 30;189(1):84-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Mar 25. J Neurosci Methods. 2010. PMID: 20346980
Cited by
-
Rodent maze studies: from following simple rules to complex map learning.Brain Struct Funct. 2024 May;229(4):823-841. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02771-x. Epub 2024 Mar 15. Brain Struct Funct. 2024. PMID: 38488865 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cognitive tasks as measures of pig welfare: a systematic review.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Nov 13;10:1251070. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1251070. eCollection 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 38033647 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of environmental enrichment for piglets in the nursery phase.Anim Biosci. 2021 Jan;34(1):154-160. doi: 10.5713/ajas.20.0222. Epub 2020 Jun 24. Anim Biosci. 2021. PMID: 32810937 Free PMC article.
-
Dietary sugars: their detection by the gut-brain axis and their peripheral and central effects in health and diseases.Eur J Nutr. 2015 Feb;54(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s00394-014-0776-y. Epub 2014 Oct 9. Eur J Nutr. 2015. PMID: 25296886 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incorporating farm animal models for the study of neuropsychiatric diseases: Expansion of the possibilities.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01332-x. Online ahead of print. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40775184 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources