Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Jun 16:(6):CD001180.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001180.pub3.

Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers

Nicky A Cullum  1 , Deyaa Al-Kurdi, Sally Em Bell-Syer
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers

Nicky A Cullum et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

  • Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.
    Cullum N, Liu Z. Cullum N, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 15;5(5):CD001180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001180.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28504325 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: Venous leg ulcers pose a significant burden for patients and healthcare systems. Ultrasound (US) may be a useful treatment for these ulcers.

Objectives: To determine whether US increases the healing of venous leg ulcers.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 24 February 2010); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2010); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to February Week 2 2010); In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (searched 24 February 2010); Ovid EMBASE 1980 to 2010 Week 07; EBSCO CINAHL 1982 to 24 February 2010.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US with no US.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed the search results and selected eligible studies. Details from included studies were summarised using a data extraction sheet, and double-checked. We tried to contact trial authors for missing data.

Main results: Eight trials were included; all had unclear, or high, risks of bias, with differences in duration of follow-up, and US regimens. Six trials evaluated high frequency US and five of these reported healing at 7 - 8 weeks. Significantly more patients healed with US than without it at 7 - 8 weeks (pooled RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.96), but later assessments at 12 weeks showed the increased risk of healing with US was no longer statistically significant (pooled RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.20). One poor-quality study of high-frequency US found no evidence of an effect on healing after three weeks' treatment.Two trials evaluated low frequency US and reported healing at different time points. Both trials reported no evidence of a difference in the proportion of ulcers healed with US compared with no US: both were significantly underpowered.

Authors' conclusions: The trials evaluating US for venous leg ulcers are small, poor-quality and heterogeneous. There is no reliable evidence that US hastens healing of venous ulcers. There is a small amount of weak evidence of increased healing with US, but this requires confirmation in larger, high-quality RCTs. There is no evidence of a benefit associated with low frequency US.

PubMed Disclaimer

Update of

LinkOut - more resources