Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov;92(3):345-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Jun 15.

Toward a neurobiology of delusions

Affiliations
Review

Toward a neurobiology of delusions

P R Corlett et al. Prog Neurobiol. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Delusions are the false and often incorrigible beliefs that can cause severe suffering in mental illness. We cannot yet explain them in terms of underlying neurobiological abnormalities. However, by drawing on recent advances in the biological, computational and psychological processes of reinforcement learning, memory, and perception it may be feasible to account for delusions in terms of cognition and brain function. The account focuses on a particular parameter, prediction error--the mismatch between expectation and experience--that provides a computational mechanism common to cortical hierarchies, fronto-striatal circuits and the amygdala as well as parietal cortices. We suggest that delusions result from aberrations in how brain circuits specify hierarchical predictions, and how they compute and respond to prediction errors. Defects in these fundamental brain mechanisms can vitiate perception, memory, bodily agency and social learning such that individuals with delusions experience an internal and external world that healthy individuals would find difficult to comprehend. The present model attempts to provide a framework through which we can build a mechanistic and translational understanding of these puzzling symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Neural Instantiation of predictive learning and belief
Theoretical model: Schematic of reward prediction error signals before learning, following learning and during extinction Health: Right DLPFC prediction error response during casual learning in healthy subjects (Corlett et al, 2004) – V: Violation of expectancy, C: Confirmation of expectancy Disease: Aberrant right frontal prediction error response in patients with first episode psychosis. The more profound the disruption, the more severe the delusions (Corlett et al, 2007b) - C: Controls, P: Patients with Psychosis
Figure 2
Figure 2. Learning Memory and Belief Alter Perception
Theoretical model: Feedforward and feedback thalamocortical projections (adapted from http://wiki.tkk.fi/display/SYNB/Neocortex). Health: The rotating hollow mask is continuously perceived as convex due to our consistent experience of faces as convex. Disease: Individuals prone to or experiencing psychosis report the hollow mask as a hollow percept (Emrich et al, 1988).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Neural Circuitry of Goal Directedness (knowledge) and habit (belief)
With repetition, rumination and reconsolidation, the control of behavior shifts from flexible goal-directed ventral cortcostriatal control toward control by the inflexible dorsal striatum and motor cortex.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Putative Delusion Circuits
Salience/Reference: A circuit incorporating the midbrain dopaminergic nuclei, the associative striatum and frontal cortex. Aberrant prediction errors in midbrain update expectancies in the frontal cortex leading to aberrantly salient percepts. Agency/others: The midbrain, PFC, Parietal cortex and cerebellum as well as the bimodal cells of the putamen. This circuit describes forward model predictions used to discern whether sensory stimulation was internally of externally generated. A breakdown in this predictive mechanism would manifest as hallucinatory tactile percepts and inferences of external control of intentional action. Fear/Paranoia: A circuit incorporating the midbrain, amygdala, frontal and parietal cortices. Here, neutral or irelevent stimuli, thoughts and percepts come to engender fear and anxiety. A dysfunction in frontoparietal circuitry engenders inappropriate social predictions and maladaptive inferences about the intentions of others. Interaction between circuits: These circuits interact and likely mutually reinforce one another.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarts H, Custers R, Wegner DM. On the inference of personal authorship: enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information. Conscious Cogn. 2005;14:439–458. - PubMed
    1. Abraham WC, Bear MF. Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:126–130. - PubMed
    1. Adams CD, Dickinson A. Actions and Habits: variations in associative representations during instrumental learning. In: Spear NE, Miller RR, editors. Information Processing in Animals: memory Mechanisms. Erlbaum; New Jersey: 1981.
    1. Allen G, McColl R, Barnard H, Ringe WK, Fleckenstein J, Cullum CM. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellar-prefrontal and cerebellar-parietal functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2005;28:39–48. - PubMed
    1. Alloy LB, Tabachnik N. Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: the joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychol Rev. 1984;91:112–149. - PubMed