Quality improvement in community health centres: the role of microsystem characteristics in the implementation of a diabetes prevention initiative
- PMID: 20558473
- DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033530
Quality improvement in community health centres: the role of microsystem characteristics in the implementation of a diabetes prevention initiative
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the role of microsystem characteristics in the translation of an evidence-based intervention (the Diabetes Prevention Initiative (DPI)) into practice in a community-health centre (CHC).
Design: Case study.
Analysis: Constant comparative method of qualitative analysis.
Setting: Community-health centre in a mid-sized city in the USA.
Participants: 27 administrators, clinicians and staff of a community-health centre implementing a DPI.
Main outcome measures: Perceptions of microsystem characteristics that influence the implementation of this initiative.
Results: Five characteristics of high-performing microsystems were reflected, but not maximised, in the implementation of the DPI. First, there was no universally shared definition of the desired purpose of the DPI. Second, investment in quality improvement (QI) was strong, yet sustainability remained a concern, since efforts were dependent upon external grant support. Third, lack of cohesiveness between the initiative planning team and the rest of the organisation served to both facilitate and constrain implementation. Fourth, administrators showed both support for new initiatives and a lack of strategic vision for QI. Fifth, this initiative substantially strained already-stretched role definitions.
Conclusions: Translation of the DPI in this CHC was constrained by the lack of a cohesive QI infrastructure and incomplete alignment with characteristics of high-performing microsystems. The findings suggest an important role for microsystem characteristics in the process of implementing evidence-based interventions. Enhancing the level of microsystem performance of CHCs is essential to informing efforts to improve quality of care in this critical safety-net system.
Similar articles
-
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 14702504
-
The disparity of frontline clinical staff and managers' perceptions of a quality and patient safety initiative.J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01506.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 20738468
-
Feasibility and impact of implementing a private care system's diabetes quality improvement intervention in the safety net: a cluster-randomized trial.Implement Sci. 2015 Jun 10;10:83. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0259-4. Implement Sci. 2015. PMID: 26059264 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The science of quality improvement implementation: developing capacity to make a difference.Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S6-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e1709c. Med Care. 2011. PMID: 20829724 Review.
-
Designing a sustainable national registry for stroke quality improvement.Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6 Suppl 2):S251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Nov 7. Am J Prev Med. 2006. PMID: 17178314 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical