Physiologic and pathologic changes in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices
- PMID: 20559982
- DOI: 10.1007/s12265-009-9092-y
Physiologic and pathologic changes in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices
Abstract
The clinical use of the newer continuous-flow pumps for mechanical circulatory support have resulted in superior outcomes including significantly reduced complication rates with improved durability over first generation pulsatile design pumps. However, as with all new technology, the newer LVADs have introduced a different set of management issues, as well as a unique risk profile into the mechanical circulatory support arena that were previously absent or unimportant with pulsatile LVADs. These include the effects of continuous flow on the systemic circulation and end-organ function, risk of thromboembolism, and pump thrombosis related to contact bearings in the blood path, the possible increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding, and ventricular arrhythmias, as well as alterations in the unloading characteristics of continuous-flow devices. This manuscript overviews the physiologic and pathologic effects that are associated with continuous-flow pumps and their unique management issues and complications.
Similar articles
-
Current axial-flow devices--the HeartMate II and Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist devices.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Fall;20(3):264-72. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.08.001. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 19038737 Review.
-
Current state of ventricular assist devices.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2011 Jun;8(2):91-8. doi: 10.1007/s11897-011-0050-z. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2011. PMID: 21336538 Review.
-
Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):437-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 13. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23490245
-
Arrhythmias after left ventricular assist device implantation: Incidence and management.Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Jan;28(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 10. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2018. PMID: 28734595 Review.
-
Sympathetic neural and hemodynamic responses to upright tilt in patients with pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist devices.Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Mar;6(2):293-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.969873. Epub 2012 Dec 18. Circ Heart Fail. 2013. PMID: 23250982
Cited by
-
Factors influencing the functional status of aortic valve in ovine models supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.Artif Organs. 2022 Jul;46(7):1334-1345. doi: 10.1111/aor.14207. Epub 2022 Mar 3. Artif Organs. 2022. PMID: 35167127 Free PMC article.
-
Late Complications Following Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.Front Surg. 2015 Aug 19;2:42. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00042. eCollection 2015. Front Surg. 2015. PMID: 26347873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neurologic Complications in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Can J Cardiol. 2023 Feb;39(2):210-221. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Can J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36400374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Octreotide therapy in patients with a left ventricular assist device and bleeding gastrointestinal angiodysplasias.Am J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;370(1):41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2025.03.008. Epub 2025 Mar 12. Am J Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40086695
-
Evaluation of platelet aggregability during left ventricular bypass using a MedTech MagLev VAD in a series of chronic calf experiments.J Artif Organs. 2013 Mar;16(1):34-41. doi: 10.1007/s10047-012-0664-2. Epub 2012 Oct 3. J Artif Organs. 2013. PMID: 23053045
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical