Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 11;86(6):957-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.016.

Loss-of-function mutations in HPSE2 cause the autosomal recessive urofacial syndrome

Affiliations

Loss-of-function mutations in HPSE2 cause the autosomal recessive urofacial syndrome

Junfeng Pang et al. Am J Hum Genet. .

Erratum in

  • Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jul 9;87(1):161. Fisher, Richard B [added]

Abstract

Previously, we localized the defective gene for the urofacial syndrome (UFS) to a region on chromosome 10q24 by homozygosity mapping. We now report evidence that Heparanse 2 (HPSE2) is the culprit gene for the syndrome. Mutations with a loss of function in the Heparanase 2 (HPSE2) gene were identified in all UFS patients originating from Colombia, the United States, and France. HPSE2 encodes a 592 aa protein that contains a domain showing sequence homology to the glycosyl hydrolase motif in the heparanase (HPSE) gene, but its exact biological function has not yet been characterized. Complete loss of HPSE2 function in UFS patients suggests that HPSE2 may be important for the synergic action of muscles implicated in facial expression and urine voiding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pedigrees Used for Redefining UFS Interval and Candidate Gene Mutation Screenings Pedigrees of UFS-2, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -18 were collected from Colombia, pedigrees UFS-30 and UFS-31 were recruited from the United States, and pedigree UFS-50 was obtained from France. Patients of UFS-30 and UFS-31 share a common Irish heritage, and patients in pedigree UFS-50 are of European descent. Of note, patients in pedigrees UFS-2, -12, -13, -18, -30, -31, and -50 were from unrelated marriages, whereas patients in pedigrees UFS-14 and -15 were from consanguineous marriages.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Redefined UFS Interval Based on Haplotype Analysis of Patients with Recombination Events Patients II.1 of UFS-2, II.1 of UFS-13, II.1 of UFS-18, II.1 of UFS-12, IV.1 of UFS-14, and V.1 of UFS-15 were Colombian, whereas II.1 of UFS-30 was a United States patient. Markers with the homozygous genotype were boxed to define the region without recombination. Alleles for markers D10S1443 and D10S603 in patients with recombination events are in bold to show the telomeric and centromeric breakpoints, respectively. The disease interval was placed between markers D10S1433 and D10S603.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A Transcriptional Map for the Newly Defined UFS Disease Interval Top: a detailed genomic structure for the HPSE2 gene. Bottom: all candidate genes located between D10S1433 and D10S603. The size in genomic DNA (kb) for each transcript is shown within the figure. The order and genomic location of each microsatellite marker within the map was defined based on the genomic sequence information from the Ensemble database. The letters represent the following: A, HPSE2 (NM_021828); B, CNNM1 (NM_020348); C, GOT1 (NM_002079); D, NKX2-3 (NM_145285); E, SLC25A28 (NM_031212); F, LOC100289312 (NM_002343029); G, ENTPD7 (NM_020354); H, COX15 (NM-078470); I, CUTC (NM-015960); J, ABCC2 (NM_000392); K, DNMBP (NM_015221); L, NCRNA00093 (NR_024130); M, CPN1 (NM_001308); N, ERLIN1 (NM_006459); O, CHUK (NM_001278); P, CWF19L1 (NM_018294); Q, SNORA12 (NR_002954); R, BLOC1S2 (NM_0173809); S, PKD2L1 (NM_016112).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mutations Identified in UFS Patients (A) All Colombian patients share one identical disease haplotype and carry a homozygous nonsense mutation c.1516C>T (R506X) in exon 11. (B) The United States patients possess one identical disease haplotype and carry a homozygous AA deletion (c.1465_1466delAA) in exon 10 at nucleotide positions 1465 and 1466 (start codon as position 1). (C) The French patients carry two different disease haplotypes: the first is identical to the United States patients, and the second is different from other patients. They carry a 2 bp AA deletion (c.1465_1466delAA) in exon 10, like the United States patients, and a 2 bp CT deletion (c.241_242delCT) in exon 1 at positions 241 and 242 (start codon as position 1).

Similar articles

  • Mutations in HPSE2 cause urofacial syndrome.
    Daly SB, Urquhart JE, Hilton E, McKenzie EA, Kammerer RA, Lewis M, Kerr B, Stuart H, Donnai D, Long DA, Burgu B, Aydogdu O, Derbent M, Garcia-Minaur S, Reardon W, Gener B, Shalev S, Smith R, Woolf AS, Black GC, Newman WG. Daly SB, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jun 11;86(6):963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.006. Am J Hum Genet. 2010. PMID: 20560210 Free PMC article.
  • Urinary tract effects of HPSE2 mutations.
    Stuart HM, Roberts NA, Hilton EN, McKenzie EA, Daly SB, Hadfield KD, Rahal JS, Gardiner NJ, Tanley SW, Lewis MA, Sites E, Angle B, Alves C, Lourenço T, Rodrigues M, Calado A, Amado M, Guerreiro N, Serras I, Beetz C, Varga RE, Silay MS, Darlow JM, Dobson MG, Barton DE, Hunziker M, Puri P, Feather SA, Goodship JA, Goodship TH, Lambert HJ, Cordell HJ; UK VUR Study Group; Saggar A, Kinali M; 4C Study Group; Lorenz C, Moeller K, Schaefer F, Bayazit AK, Weber S, Newman WG, Woolf AS. Stuart HM, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Apr;26(4):797-804. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013090961. Epub 2014 Aug 21. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 25145936 Free PMC article.
  • Clinical and genetic characteristics for the Urofacial Syndrome (UFS).
    Tu Y, Yang P, Yang J, Xu Y, Xiong F, Yu Q, Gu W, Pond D, Mendelsohn N, Lachmeijer GA, Zhang S, Wang CY. Tu Y, et al. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Apr 15;7(5):1842-8. eCollection 2014. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014. PMID: 24966895 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Heparanase 2 and Urofacial Syndrome, a Genetic Neuropathy.
    Roberts NA, Woolf AS. Roberts NA, et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1221:807-819. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-34521-1_35. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020. PMID: 32274739 Review.
  • Dysfunctional bladder neurophysiology in urofacial syndrome Hpse2 mutant mice.
    Manak I, Gurney AM, McCloskey KD, Woolf AS, Roberts NA. Manak I, et al. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Sep;39(7):1930-1938. doi: 10.1002/nau.24450. Epub 2020 Jul 1. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020. PMID: 32609936

Cited by

References

    1. Ochoa B. The urofacial (Ochoa) syndrome revisited. J. Urol. 1992;148:580–583. - PubMed
    1. Ochoa B., Gorlin R.J. Urofacial (ochoa) syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1987;27:661–667. - PubMed
    1. Ochoa B. Can a congenital dysfunctional bladder be diagnosed from a smile? The Ochoa syndrome updated. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2004;19:6–12. - PubMed
    1. Wang C.Y., Hawkins-Lee B., Ochoa B., Walker R.D., She J.X. Homozygosity and linkage-disequilibrium mapping of the urofacial (Ochoa) syndrome gene to a 1-cM interval on chromosome 10q23-q24. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997;60:1461–1467. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang C.Y., Huang Y.Q., Shi J.D., Marron M.P., Ruan Q.G., Hawkins-Lee B., Ochoa B., She J.X. Genetic homogeneity, high-resolution mapping, and mutation analysis of the urofacial (Ochoa) syndrome and exclusion of the glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase gene (GOT1) in the critical region as the disease gene. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1999;84:454–459. - PubMed

Publication types