Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1991 Feb;6(2):263-6.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137319.

In-vitro fertilization, gamete- or zygote intra-fallopian transfer for the treatment of male infertility

Affiliations
Comparative Study

In-vitro fertilization, gamete- or zygote intra-fallopian transfer for the treatment of male infertility

H Tournaye et al. Hum Reprod. 1991 Feb.

Abstract

This retrospective study compares in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), gamete intra-Fallopian (GIFT) and zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT) for the treatment of male infertility in 266 couples (n = 318 cycles). The IVF-ET technique revealed a total pregnancy rate of 14.1% per cycle and 29.1% per transfer. The conception rate with GIFT was 17.8%; an abortion rate of 50% was noted. The ZIFT procedure scored a 20.9% total pregnancy rate per cycle and 33.3% per transfer. The cumulative take home baby rates per couple for IVF-ET, GIFT and ZIFT were 13.5, 7.0 and 20.0%, respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • IVF versus GIFT.
    Craft I, al-Shawaf T. Craft I, et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992 Oct;9(5):424-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01204046. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992. PMID: 1482835 No abstract available.
  • Factors affecting sperm yield during swim-up.
    Purvis K, Egdetveit I. Purvis K, et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993 Feb;10(2):145-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01207738. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993. PMID: 8339019

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources