Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 1;172(1):4-9.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq119. Epub 2010 Jun 18.

Overview of the Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers

Collaborators, Affiliations

Overview of the Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers

Kathy J Helzlsouer et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

The Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers (VDPP) brought together 10 cohorts to conduct a prospective study of the association between vitamin D status, measured as serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and the development of 7 rarer cancer sites: endometrial, esophageal, gastric, kidney, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. The cohorts come from 3 continents, with participants from a wide range of latitude who are racially diverse. Across each cancer site, there was no evidence of a protective association between higher concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (>75 nmol/L) and cancer outcome. An increased risk at very high levels (> or =100 nmol/L) was noted for pancreatic cancer, confirming previous reports. The articles included in this issue detail the overall design and governance of the project, correlates of vitamin D status, and results from the cancer site-specific investigations. The Vitamin D Pooling Project realizes a major goal of consortium efforts, namely, to rigorously test hypotheses for rarer cancer outcomes that may not be adequately addressed in any one prospective cohort study. The results of this study have application for the planning and conduct of intervention trials, especially in determining potential risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for cancer risk by site across categories of circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/L), Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. Odds ratios were derived from conditional logistic regression models. Reference category: 50–<75 nmol/L 25(OH)D. A, kidney cancer adjusted for education, body mass index, height, smoking status at blood draw, history of high blood pressure at blood draw, history of diabetes at blood draw, and alcohol use at blood draw. B, non-Hodgkin lymphoma adjusted for height (≤165, >165–171, >171–177.781, >177.781 cm). C, upper gastrointestinal (combined esophageal and gastric) cancers adjusted for alcohol, smoking, education, and history of gastric surgery. D, pancreatic cancer adjusted for body mass index (<18.5, 18.5–<25.0, 25.0–<30.0, 30.0–<35.0, ≥35.0 kg/m2 (WHO categories), missing), smoking (never, former quit ≥15 years ago, former quit 1–<15 years ago, former quit <1 year or currently smoking <20 cigarettes per day, and former quit <1 year or currently smoking ≥20 cigarettes per day), and diabetes (yes, no, missing). The highest category of vitamin D and association with pancreatic cancer is statistically significant (95% confidence interval: 1.23, 3.64). E, endometrial cancer adjusted for education (less than high school, completed high school, vocational school, some college, college graduate, graduate studies, missing), menopausal status (pre-, peri-, post-, missing), age at menarche (<13, ≥13 years of age, missing), parity (0, 1, 2, 3, ≥4, missing), oral contraceptive use (never, ever, missing), hormone replacement therapy (never, ever, missing), smoking (never, former, current, missing), history of high blood pressure (yes, no, missing), history of diabetes (yes, no, missing), and body mass index (<25, 25–<30, ≥30 kg/m2, missing). F, ovarian cancer adjusted for duration of oral contraceptive use and number of pregnancies. CI, confidence interval; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; WHO, World Health Organization.

Comment in

References

    1. Khazai N, Judd SE, Tangpricha V. Calcium and vitamin D: skeletal and extraskeletal health. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008;10(2):110–117. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2009. Dietary reference intakes for vitamin D and calcium. ( http://www.iom.edu/Activities/Nutrition/DRIVitDCalcium.aspx). (Accessed October 15, 2009)
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Working Group Reports. Vol. 5. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008. Vitamin D and cancer.
    1. Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Hayes RB, Horst RL, et al. Serum vitamin D and risk of pancreatic cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Trial. Cancer Res. 2009;69(4):1439–1447. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Proceedings of the conference Vitamin D and Cancer: Current Dilemmas and Future Needs, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, May 7–8, 2007. Nutr Rev. 2007;65(8 pt 2):S71–S137. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding