Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 20562609
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e3ec61
Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: In this randomized, controlled, unblinded trial, we sought to test Repeat Back's (RB) effect on comprehension following informed consent discussions.
Summary background data: RB has been suggested as a method to improve patient comprehension when obtaining informed consent. In this technique, patients are asked to recount what they have been told in the informed consent discussion. Despite preliminary data, this practice has not been evaluated in any large scale study.
Methods: This study was conducted in 7 Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers where informed consent is obtained using iMedConsent, the VA's computer based platform. Patients scheduled for elective surgeries were randomized to RB (a module added to the iMedConsent package) or standard iMedConsent (no RB). Comprehension was tested after the informed consent using procedure-specific questionnaires. Time stamps in the iMedConsent program estimated the time spent completing the informed consent process. Provider and patient satisfaction were measured using 5-point Likert scales. Statistical comparisons of groups were performed using t-tests and chi tests.
Results: A total of 575 patients were enrolled. In the RB group, providers spent 2.6 minutes longer (P < 0.0001) obtaining informed consent. The mean comprehension score was significantly higher in the RB group (71.4%) versus the no RB group (68.2%, P = 0.03); the effect was greatest in carotid endarterectomy patients (RB = 73.4% vs. no RB = 67.7%, P = 0.02). Quality of decision making was rated similarly. Providers were neutral to slightly favorable regarding RB.
Conclusions: RB implemented within an electronic informed consent system improved patient comprehension. The additional time required was acceptable to providers. RB should be considered as an enhancement to surgical informed consent.This clinical trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier NCT00288899).
Similar articles
-
Predictors of comprehension during surgical informed consent.J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.049. J Am Coll Surg. 2010. PMID: 20510800 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient perceptions of surgical informed consent: is repeat back helpful or harmful?J Patient Saf. 2014 Sep;10(3):140-5. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a00317. J Patient Saf. 2014. PMID: 24522223 Clinical Trial.
-
Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy.Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):205-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318180a3a7. Ann Surg. 2008. PMID: 18650629 Clinical Trial.
-
Beyond consent--improving understanding in surgical patients.Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.010. Epub 2011 Jun 8. Am J Surg. 2012. PMID: 21641573 Review.
-
Research methodologies in informed consent studies involving surgical and invasive procedures: time to re-examine?Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Aug 27. Patient Educ Couns. 2013. PMID: 24021416 Review.
Cited by
-
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Comprehension of Biospecimen Collection: a Nationwide University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Study.J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):292-300. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1464-z. J Cancer Educ. 2020. PMID: 30612315 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Impact of Using Patient-Specific 3D Prints during Consent for Skull Base Neurosurgery.J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022 Sep 13;84(5):463-469. doi: 10.1055/a-1885-1111. eCollection 2023 Oct. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022. PMID: 37671293 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of a culturally competent APOL1 genetic testing programme into living donor evaluation: A two-site, non-randomised, pre-post trial design.BMJ Open. 2023 May 15;13(5):e067657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067657. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37188469 Free PMC article.
-
Documenting the process of patient decision making: a review of the development of the law on consent.Future Hosp J. 2016 Jun;3(2):109-113. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-109. Future Hosp J. 2016. PMID: 31098199 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):119-143. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19896348. Epub 2020 Jan 16. Med Decis Making. 2020. PMID: 31948345 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical