Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3953-60.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.25129.

A survey of image-guided radiation therapy use in the United States

Daniel R Simpson  1 , Joshua D Lawson, Sameer K Nath, Brent S Rose, Arno J Mundt, Loren K Mell
Affiliations

A survey of image-guided radiation therapy use in the United States

Daniel R Simpson et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is a novel array of in-room imaging modalities that are used for tumor localization and patient setup in radiation oncology. The prevalence of IGRT use among US radiation oncologists is unknown.

Methods: A random sample of 1600 radiation oncologists was surveyed by Internet, e-mail and fax regarding the frequency of IGRT use, clinical applications, and future plans for use. The definition of IGRT included imaging technologies that are used for setup verification or tumor localization during treatment.

Results: Of 1089 evaluable respondents, 393 responses (36.1%) were received. The proportion of radiation oncologists using IGRT was 93.5%. When the use of megavoltage (MV) portal imaging was excluded from the definition of IGRT, the proportion using IGRT was 82.3%. The majority used IGRT rarely (in <25% of their patients; 28.9%) or infrequently (in 25%-50% of their patients; 33.1%). The percentages using ultrasound, video, MV-planar, kilovoltage (kV)-planar, and volumetric technologies were 22.3%, 3.2%, 62.7%, 57.7%, and 58.8%, respectively. Among IGRT users, the most common disease sites treated were genitourinary (91.1%), head and neck (74.2%), central nervous system (71.9%), and lung (66.9%). Overall, 59.1% of IGRT users planned to increase use, and 71.4% of nonusers planned to adopt IGRT in the future.

Conclusions: IGRT is widely used among radiation oncologists. On the basis of prospective plans of responders, its use is expected to increase. Further research will be required to determine the safety, cost efficacy, and optimal applications of these technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest Notification: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survey Flow Chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Utilization of individual image-guided radiation therapy modalities, by disease site. MV, megavoltage; kV, kilovoltage; CNS, central nervous system; H&N, head and neck; GI, gastrointestinal; GU, genitourinary; GYN, gynecology.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of academic versus private practice physicians using image-guided radiation therapy technologies. MV, megavoltage; kV, kilovoltage. *p<0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative adoption of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technologies. The total percentage of respondents adopting or discontinuing IGRT utilization is plotted by year. MV: megavoltage, kV: kilovoltage.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mell LK, Mehrotra AK, Mundt AJ. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy use in the U.S., 2004. Cancer. 2005 Sep 15;104(6):1296–1303. - PubMed
    1. Chang BK, Timmerman RD. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: a comprehensive review. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec;30(6):637–644. - PubMed
    1. Johns HE, Cunningham JR. A precision cobalt 60 unit for fixed field and rotation therapy. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1959 Jan;81(1):4–12. - PubMed
    1. Johnson LS, Milliken BD, Hadley SW, Pelizzari CA, Haraf DJ, Chen GT. Initial clinical experience with a video-based patient positioning system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Aug 1;45(1):205–213. - PubMed
    1. Connor WG, Boone ML, Veomett R, et al. Patient repositioning and motion detection using a video cancellation system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1975 Oct–Nov;1(1–2):147–153. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms