Timing of palliative care referral and symptom burden in phase 1 cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 20564164
- PMCID: PMC2936661
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25389
Timing of palliative care referral and symptom burden in phase 1 cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Phase 1 trials offer patients with advanced cancer the opportunity to pursue life-prolonging cancer treatments. In the current study, the timing of referral and symptom burden between patients referred to palliative care by phase 1 oncologists and those referred by non-phase 1 oncologists were compared.
Methods: All 57 patients with advanced solid tumors who were referred by phase 1 oncologists to the palliative care outpatient clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) between 2007 and 2008 were included. The comparison cohort was comprised of 114 non-phase 1 patients who were stratified by age, sex, and cancer diagnosis in a 1:2 ratio. Information regarding patient characteristics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), timing of referral, and survival was retrieved.
Results: Both cohorts had the following matched characteristics: average age of 57 years, with 44% of the patients being female and 47% having gastrointestinal cancers. At the time of palliative care consultation, patients referred by phase 1 oncologists were more likely than patients referred by non-phase 1 oncologists to have a better performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1: 61% vs 36% [P = .003). The ESAS was not significantly different with the exception of better well-being in the phase 1 cohort (mean, 4.5 vs 5.5; P = .03). No difference was found for the duration between registration at MDACC and palliative care consultation (13 months vs 11 months; P = .41) and overall survival from the time of palliative care consultation (5 months vs 4 months; P = .69).
Conclusions: Outpatients referred to palliative care by phase 1 oncologists were found to have a better performance status but similar symptom burden compared with patients referred by non-phase 1 oncologists. Patients with phase 1 involvement did not appear to have delayed palliative care referral compared with non-phase 1 patients. The results of the current study support the development of a simultaneous care model.
© 2010 American Cancer Society.
Figures
References
-
- Tishelman C, Petersson LM, Degner LF, et al. Symptom prevalence, intensity, and distress in patients with inoperable lung cancer in relation to time of death. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5381–5389. - PubMed
-
- Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, et al. Symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress in a cancer population. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:183–189. - PubMed
-
- Cox K. Informed consent and decision-making: Patients’ experiences of the process of recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:31–38. - PubMed
-
- Cohen MZ, Slomka J, Pentz RD, et al. Phase I participants’ views of quality of life and trial participation burdens. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:885–890. - PubMed
-
- Cox K. Enhancing cancer clinical trial management: Recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants’ experiences. Psychooncology. 2000;9:314–322. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
