Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;24(2):292-9.
doi: 10.1037/a0018126.

The reliability and validity of the family history method for assessing pathological gambling and gambling involvement

Jarrod M Ellingson  1 , Wendy S Slutske, Nicholas G Martin
Affiliations

The reliability and validity of the family history method for assessing pathological gambling and gambling involvement

Jarrod M Ellingson et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

The family history (FH) method, which involves the use of an informant to gather information about one or more family members, has been used in a number of previous gambling studies. However, no evaluation of the reliability and validity has been conducted on the use of the FH method for assessing pathological gambling (PG) and gambling involvement. The current study examined the test-retest and inter-rater reliability and the validity of the FH method for assessing PG and gambling involvement among a large community-based sample of adult twins (N = 4,764) reporting on their parents, co-twins, and spouses. The test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities of the FH reports of PG were high. Validity of the FH reports of PG was low, primarily because of substantial underestimation of pathology (low sensitivity). The test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities of the FH reports of gambling involvement (ever gambled, ever gambled monthly, and ever gambled weekly) were moderate and the sensitivities were quite high. The results of this study support the use of the FH method for studies of PG and gambling involvement. A number of potential explanations for the low sensitivity of FH reports of PG are elaborated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott MW, Volberg RA, Williams MM, Zealand N, Affairs DoI. Seven years on: A follow-up study of frequent and problem gamblers living in the community. Dept. of Internal Affairs; 1999.
    1. Almasy L, Porjesz B, Blangero J, Goate A, Edenberg HJ, Chorlian DB, et al. Genetics of event-related brain potentials in response to a semantic priming paradigm in families with a history of alcoholism. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2001;68(1):128–135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreasen NC, Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Winokur G. The family history method using diagnostic criteria: Reliability and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1977;34(10):1229–1235. - PubMed
    1. Andreasen NC, Rice J, Endicott J, Reich T, Coryell W. The family history approach to diagnosis: How useful is it? Archives of General Psychiatry. 1986;43(5):421–429. - PubMed
    1. Black DW, Monahan PO, Temkit MH, Shaw M. A family study of pathological gambling. Psychiatry Research. 2006;141(3):295–303. - PubMed

Publication types