Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors?
- PMID: 20565212
- DOI: 10.1037/a0019764
Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors?
Abstract
We investigated the effects of the duration and type of to-be-articulated distractors during encoding of a verbal list into short-term memory (STM). Distractors and to-be-remembered items alternated during list presentation, as in the complex-span task that underlies much of working-memory research. According to an interference model of STM, known as serial order in a box (SOB; Farrell & Lewandowsky, 2002), additional repeated articulations of the same word between list items should cause minimal further disruption of encoding into STM even though the retention interval for early list items is increased. SOB also predicts that the articulation of several different distractor items should lead to much enhanced disruption if the distractor interval is increased. Those predictions were qualitatively confirmed in 4 experiments that found that it is the type of distractors, not their total duration, that determines the success of encoding a list into STM. The results pose a challenge to temporal models of complex-span performance, such as the time-based resource sharing model (Barrouillet, Bernardin, & Camos, 2004). The results add to a growing body of evidence that memory for the short term is not exclusively governed by purely temporal processes.
(c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved
Similar articles
-
Forgetting from working memory: does novelty encoding matter?J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):110-25. doi: 10.1037/a0028475. Epub 2012 May 7. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013. PMID: 22563635
-
Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory?J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1561-4. doi: 10.1037/a0013356. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008. PMID: 18980415
-
Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):665-85. doi: 10.1037/a0026337. Epub 2011 Dec 5. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012. PMID: 22141748 Review.
-
Working memory span development: a time-based resource-sharing model account.Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;45(2):477-90. doi: 10.1037/a0014615. Dev Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19271832
-
Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: a latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage.Memory. 2009 Aug;17(6):635-54. doi: 10.1080/09658210902998047. Epub 2009 Jun 17. Memory. 2009. PMID: 19536691 Review.
Cited by
-
On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):455-468. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00982-w. Mem Cognit. 2020. PMID: 31641994
-
Sequential dependencies in recall of sequences: filling in the blanks.Mem Cognit. 2013 Aug;41(6):938-52. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0310-0. Mem Cognit. 2013. PMID: 23519990
-
Dopamine affects short-term memory corruption over time in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2019 Aug 5;5:16. doi: 10.1038/s41531-019-0088-2. eCollection 2019. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2019. PMID: 31396548 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence Against Novelty-Gated Encoding in Serial Recall.J Cogn. 2022 Feb 8;5(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.207. eCollection 2022. J Cogn. 2022. PMID: 36072121 Free PMC article.
-
Response suppression contributes to recency in serial recall.Mem Cognit. 2012 Oct;40(7):1070-80. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0212-6. Mem Cognit. 2012. PMID: 22555889
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical