Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 20:10:48.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-48.

Generic quality of life assessment in dementia patients: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Generic quality of life assessment in dementia patients: a prospective cohort study

Claudia Schiffczyk et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is increasingly used to characterize the impact of disease and the efficacy of interventions.

Methods: Prospective cohort study in patients' and proxies' homes with 137 patients with dementia (age 52 to 88; Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) 3 to 28) and their proxies (age 43 to 90). MMSE, Behave-AD, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and Bayer-ADL scale (B-ADL), and the Euroqol (EQ-5D; patient self-rating, proxy self-rating, and proxy-rating of patient).

Results: B-ADL impairment and Behave-AD total score increased with dementia severity (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). Patients' self-rated QoL and proxies' self-rated QoL were unrelated to dementia severity (p = 0.148 and p = 0.414, respectively). The difference between patients' self- and proxies'-rating of the patient's QoL correlated with the patient's MMSE (Spearman's rho = -0.434; p < 0.001), even if analysis was constrained to patients with mild AD (rho = -0.328; p = 0.019). The proxies' rating of the patients QoL was not only correlated with cognitive and behavioral symptoms of the patient but also with mood (GDS-score; rho = 0.317; p < 0.001) and cognitive abilities (verbal fluency; rho = 0.209; p < 0.018) of the proxy.

Conclusion: Proxies' assessment of the patients' QoL is related to the proxies' health, and the difference of patient's and proxie's QoL-rating is correlated with dementia severity even in mild dementia stages. QOL measures use ratings of the individual to assess the impact of symptoms and disorders on everyday life. In dementia patients, however, this impact is not captured since patients' and proxies' self-assessment of their own QoL do not reflect severity of disease whatsoever. Patients' and proxies' influencing variables render the score obtained with generic quality of life assessment meaningless in capturing the impact of dementia. Decisions on initiation or discontinuation of treatment or allocation of other resources for patients with dementia therefore need not depend on generic assessment of quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scores in the A) Euroqol (EQ-5d; score range EQ-5d: 0 - 15) and the B) Euroqol with added cognitive domain (EQ-5d + c; score range EQ-5d + c: 0 - 18) for the patient self-rating (white bars) and the proxy-rating of the patient (black bars).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Difference of the proxy-rating of the patients' quality of life and the patient self-rating for the EQ-5d (black dots; score range EQ-5d: 0 - 15) and the EQ-5d + c (white squares; score range EQ-5d + c: 0 - 18) against the MMSE score (score range MMSE: 0 - 30).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Erkinjuntti T, Ostbye T, Steenhuis R, Hachinski V. The effect of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dementia. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1667–1674. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712043372306. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orley J, Saxena S, Herrman H. Quality of life and mental illness. Reflections from the perspective of the WHOQOL. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;172:291–293. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.4.291. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lawton MP. Quality of life in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl 3):138–50. 138-150. - PubMed
    1. Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:13–35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nemeth G. Health related quality of life outcome instruments. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 1):S44–S51. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1046-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types