Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;13(4):345-52.
doi: 10.1177/159101990701300405. Epub 2008 Feb 1.

Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: incidence and endovascular management

Affiliations

Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: incidence and endovascular management

G Oszkinis et al. Interv Neuroradiol. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Surgical procedures designed to restore vascular patency for a recurrent stenosis following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are burdened with technical difficulties as well as with the possibility of serious neurological complications. An endovascular approach employing transluminal percutaneous angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) is a promising solution to these problems. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of carotid artery restenosis following CEA, and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treating post-CEA restenosis with an endovascular technique (PTAS). One hundred and two patients who underwent CEA for symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis were included in the analysis. Clinical and sonographic follow-up examinations identified carotid artery restenosis in 16 patients, who fulfilled our criteria for endovascular treatment. Carotid PTAS was performed on symptomatic patients with a stenosis over 60% of the artery lumen (n=7) and in asymptomatic patients with a stenosis over 80% (n=9). The post-PTAS patients were evaluated by duplex sonography every three months over a 24 month follow-up period for evidence of restenosis. The cumulative incidence of post-CEA carotid restenosis qualifying for PTAS was 9.3% during an average 12-month follow-up interval. The average time from CEA to carotid PTAS was 11 months. All 16 endovascular procedures were technically successful. All of the carotid arteries were widely patent following PTAS. There were no immediate perioperative complications. One patient died two days after carotid PTAS from a cerebral hemorrhage. Thirteen of the 16 patients remained asymptomatic and had no sonographic evidence of significant restenosis during the 24- month post-PTAS follow-up period. One patient developed a symptomatic 80% restenosis proximal to the stent six months after carotid PTAS. Another patient developed an asymptomatic 60% restenosis proximal to the stent at 24 months. One patient was lost to follow-up. Following CEA, there is a significant risk of developing a symptomatic or high-grade carotid artery restenosis requiring correction. Endovascular treatment (PTAS) of a recurrent stenosis after CEA is a safe and effective alternative to repeat carotid surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A) Restenosis of the internal carotid artery in a long segment - 12 months after endarterectomy, B) PTAS with a 6 x 30 stent in the left internal carotid artery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A) Leriche syndrome patient with obstructed left common carotid artery and restenosis of the right internal carotid artery. Guide catheter was advanced through the left brachial artery into the right common carotid artery, B) Guide catheter tip in the right common carotid artery. Critical stenosis of the internal carotid artery, C) Angioplasty with stent traversing the common carotid artery bifurcation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453. - PubMed
    1. Zierler RE, Bandyk DF, Thiele BL. Carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy. Arch Surg. 1982;117:1408–1415. - PubMed
    1. Mattos MA, Van-Bemmelen PS, Barkmier LD. Routine surveillance after carotid endarterectomy: does it affect clinical management? J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:819–830. - PubMed
    1. McDonnell CO, Legge D, et al. Carotid artery angioplasty for restenosis following endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:163–166. - PubMed
    1. Moore WS, Kempczinski RF, et al. Recurrent carotid stenosis: results of the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. Stroke. 1998;29:2018–2025. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources