Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: incidence and endovascular management
- PMID: 20566103
- PMCID: PMC3329240
- DOI: 10.1177/159101990701300405
Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: incidence and endovascular management
Abstract
Surgical procedures designed to restore vascular patency for a recurrent stenosis following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are burdened with technical difficulties as well as with the possibility of serious neurological complications. An endovascular approach employing transluminal percutaneous angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) is a promising solution to these problems. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of carotid artery restenosis following CEA, and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treating post-CEA restenosis with an endovascular technique (PTAS). One hundred and two patients who underwent CEA for symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis were included in the analysis. Clinical and sonographic follow-up examinations identified carotid artery restenosis in 16 patients, who fulfilled our criteria for endovascular treatment. Carotid PTAS was performed on symptomatic patients with a stenosis over 60% of the artery lumen (n=7) and in asymptomatic patients with a stenosis over 80% (n=9). The post-PTAS patients were evaluated by duplex sonography every three months over a 24 month follow-up period for evidence of restenosis. The cumulative incidence of post-CEA carotid restenosis qualifying for PTAS was 9.3% during an average 12-month follow-up interval. The average time from CEA to carotid PTAS was 11 months. All 16 endovascular procedures were technically successful. All of the carotid arteries were widely patent following PTAS. There were no immediate perioperative complications. One patient died two days after carotid PTAS from a cerebral hemorrhage. Thirteen of the 16 patients remained asymptomatic and had no sonographic evidence of significant restenosis during the 24- month post-PTAS follow-up period. One patient developed a symptomatic 80% restenosis proximal to the stent six months after carotid PTAS. Another patient developed an asymptomatic 60% restenosis proximal to the stent at 24 months. One patient was lost to follow-up. Following CEA, there is a significant risk of developing a symptomatic or high-grade carotid artery restenosis requiring correction. Endovascular treatment (PTAS) of a recurrent stenosis after CEA is a safe and effective alternative to repeat carotid surgery.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040. J Vasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16476606
-
Surgical or endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis.Bratisl Lek Listy. 2002;103(12):484-92. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2002. PMID: 12696779
-
Carotid endarterectomy for treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis: long-term follow-up results and surgery experiences from one single centre.Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Aug 24;2(3):140-146. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000089. eCollection 2017 Sep. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017. PMID: 28994832 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of redo stenting versus endarterectomy for in-stent stenosis after carotid artery stenting.J Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;73(4):1282-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.102. Epub 2020 Aug 28. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32861870
-
Systematic and Comprehensive Comparison of Incidence of Restenosis Between Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis.World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.118. Epub 2019 Jan 31. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30710719
Cited by
-
Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions.J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1526602815581597. Epub 2015 Apr 15. J Endovasc Ther. 2015. PMID: 25878023 Free PMC article.
-
Bench-to-Bedside in Vascular Medicine: Optimizing the Translational Pipeline for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.Circ Res. 2021 Jun 11;128(12):1927-1943. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318265. Epub 2021 Jun 10. Circ Res. 2021. PMID: 34110900 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Loss of follow-up after carotid revascularization is associated with worse long-term stroke and death.J Vasc Surg. 2023 Feb;77(2):548-554.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.023. Epub 2022 Sep 29. J Vasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 36183990 Free PMC article.
-
Asymptomatic dissecting intimal lesions of common carotid arteries after carotid endarterectomy.Surg Today. 2015 Oct;45(10):1227-32. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1018-x. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Surg Today. 2015. PMID: 25160766
-
Risk Factors for Recurrent Carotid-Artery Stenosis Following Stenting Treatment.Med Sci Monit. 2019 Apr 3;25:2429-2434. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913894. Med Sci Monit. 2019. PMID: 30942198 Free PMC article.
References
-
- North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453. - PubMed
-
- Zierler RE, Bandyk DF, Thiele BL. Carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy. Arch Surg. 1982;117:1408–1415. - PubMed
-
- Mattos MA, Van-Bemmelen PS, Barkmier LD. Routine surveillance after carotid endarterectomy: does it affect clinical management? J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:819–830. - PubMed
-
- McDonnell CO, Legge D, et al. Carotid artery angioplasty for restenosis following endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:163–166. - PubMed
-
- Moore WS, Kempczinski RF, et al. Recurrent carotid stenosis: results of the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. Stroke. 1998;29:2018–2025. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources