Molecular identification and phylogeny of Myzomyia and Neocellia series of Anopheles subgenus Cellia (Diptera: Culicidae)
- PMID: 20566310
- DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.05.016
Molecular identification and phylogeny of Myzomyia and Neocellia series of Anopheles subgenus Cellia (Diptera: Culicidae)
Abstract
Any biological study is only meaningful if the concerned organism is accurately identified; this is particularly important in vector-borne disease studies where correct and precise identification of the target species has medical and practical implications, such as in vector control. The Myzomyia series is divided into four groups including the Funestus group, which consists of five subgroups, i.e. Aconitus, Culicifacies, Funestus, Minimus, Rivulorum, and the Neocellia series, which is divided into three groups Annularis, Jamesii and Maculatus. Members of the Funestus group of Myzomyia and the Annularis group of the Neocellia series are difficult to identify because of the morphological overlap that exists within the groups. Therefore a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was developed based on the sequence of the D3 region of 28S rDNA to distinguish between four members (An. fluviatilis, An. culicifacies, An. varuna and An. aconitus) of three subgroups (Minimus, Aconitus, Culicifacies) of the Funestus group of Myzomyia and three members (An. annularis, An. pallidus and An. philippinensis) of the Annularis group of the Neocellia series of the Anopheles subgenus Cellia, prevalent in Orissa, India. Polymorphism present on the D3 region of rDNA allowed the development of a species-specific primer that when combined with two universal primers lead to a simple and sensitive multiplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) assay. This assay can be applied as an unbiased confirmatory method for the identification of morphological variants, imperfectly preserved specimens and life stages for which taxonomic keys do not allow a definitive species determination. Finally, phylogenetic relationships between the members of the two series were determined using D3 sequence data. The phylogenetic relationships inferred from maximum parsimony and the neighbour joining analysis separated two distinct monophyletic clades, one consisting of species of Myzomyia and other of species of the Neocellia series. The molecular phylogeny obtained in this work matches with that of the classical morphological taxonomy reasonably well, with proper species arrangements.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of the phylogenetic relationship of Anopheles species, subgenus Cellia (Diptera: Culicidae) and using it to define the relationship of morphologically similar species.Infect Genet Evol. 2009 Dec;9(6):1204-24. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.06.021. Epub 2009 Jul 2. Infect Genet Evol. 2009. PMID: 19577013
-
PCR-RFLP method for the identification of four members of the Anopheles annularis group of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Mar;101(3):239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.03.007. Epub 2006 Jun 27. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007. PMID: 16806334
-
Multiplex PCR assay and phylogenetic analysis of sequences derived from D2 domain of 28S rDNA distinguished members of the Anopheles culicifacies complex into two groups, A/D and B/C/E.Infect Genet Evol. 2009 Mar;9(2):271-7. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.12.007. Epub 2008 Dec 24. Infect Genet Evol. 2009. PMID: 19138765
-
Bionomics, taxonomy, and distribution of the major malaria vector taxa of Anopheles subgenus Cellia in Southeast Asia: an updated review.Infect Genet Evol. 2008 Jul;8(4):489-503. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29. Infect Genet Evol. 2008. PMID: 18178531 Review.
-
A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species.Insect Mol Biol. 1996 Feb;5(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00034.x. Insect Mol Biol. 1996. PMID: 8630529 Review.
Cited by
-
Utility of Complete Mitochondrial Genomes in Phylogenetic Classification of the Species of Anopheles (Culicidae: Anophelinae).J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2021 Mar 31;15(1):1-20. doi: 10.18502/jad.v15i1.6483. eCollection 2021 Mar. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2021. PMID: 34277853 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials