Expert credibility in climate change
- PMID: 20566872
- PMCID: PMC2901439
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1003187107
Expert credibility in climate change
Abstract
Although preliminary estimates from published literature and expert surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists on the tenets of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), the American public expresses substantial doubt about both the anthropogenic cause and the level of scientific agreement underpinning ACC. A broad analysis of the climate scientist community itself, the distribution of credibility of dissenting researchers relative to agreeing researchers, and the level of agreement among top climate experts has not been conducted and would inform future ACC discussions. Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97-98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Comment in
-
Climate denier, skeptic, or contrarian?Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 28;107(39):E151; author reply E152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010507107. Epub 2010 Aug 31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010. PMID: 20807754 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Expert credibility and truth.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 23;107(47):E176; author reply E177. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012156107. Epub 2010 Nov 8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010. PMID: 21059951 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Regarding Anderegg et al. and climate change credibility.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 28;107(52):E188; author reply E189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013268108. Epub 2010 Dec 20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010. PMID: 21173280 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Oreskes N. Beyond the ivory tower. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science. 2004;306:1686. - PubMed
-
- Doran PT, Zimmerman MK. Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos Trans AGU. 2009;90:22–23.
-
- IPCC . Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, et al., editors. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 2007. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
-
- Pew Research Center for People and the Press Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media. Pew Research Center. 2009. [Accessed December 1, 2009]. Available at http://people-press.org/report/528/
-
- Dunlap RE, McCright AM. A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment. 2008;50:26–35.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases