Phase III trial comparing protracted intravenous fluorouracil infusion alone or with yttrium-90 resin microspheres radioembolization for liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy
- PMID: 20567019
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5643
Phase III trial comparing protracted intravenous fluorouracil infusion alone or with yttrium-90 resin microspheres radioembolization for liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy
Abstract
Purpose: Liver dissemination is a major cause of mortality among patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Hepatic intra-arterial injection of the beta-emitting isotope yttrium-90 ((90)Y) bound to resin microspheres (radioembolization) delivers therapeutic radiation doses to liver metastases with minimal damage to adjacent tissues.
Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III trial in patients with unresectable, chemotherapy-refractory liver-limited metastatic CRC (mCRC) comparing arm A (fluorouracil [FU] protracted intravenous infusion 300 mg/m(2) days 1 through 14 every 3 weeks) and arm B (radioembolization plus intravenous FU 225 mg/m(2) days 1 through 14 then 300 mg/m(2) days 1 through 14 every 3 weeks) until hepatic progression. The primary end point was time to liver progression (TTLP). Cross-over to radioembolization was permitted after progression in arm A.
Results: Forty-six patients were randomly assigned and 44 were eligible for analysis (arm A, n = 23; arm B, n = 21). Median follow-up was 24.8 months. Median TTLP was 2.1 and 5.5 months in arms A and B, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.72; P = .003). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 2.1 and 4.5 months, respectively (HR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.94; P = .03). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were recorded in six patients after FU monotherapy and in one patient after radioembolization plus FU treatment (P = .10). Twenty-five of 44 patients received further treatment after progression, including 10 patients in arm A who received radioembolization. Median overall survival was 7.3 and 10.0 months in arms A and B, respectively (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.78; P = .80).
Conclusion: Radioembolization with (90)Y-resin microspheres plus FU is well tolerated and significantly improves TTLP and TTP compared with FU alone. This procedure is a valid therapeutic option for chemotherapy-refractory liver-limited mCRC.
Similar articles
-
Hepatic yttrium-90 radioembolization of chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer liver metastases.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Aug;19(8):1187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Jun 27. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18656012
-
Repetitive chemoembolization with melphalan plus intra-arterial immuno-chemotherapy within 5-fluorouracil and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as effective first- and second-line treatment of disseminated colorectal liver metastases.Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 Nov-Dec;50(54):1919-26. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003. PMID: 14696433
-
Comparison of 5-fluorouracil alone, 5-fluorouracil with levamisole, and 5-fluorouracil with hepatic irradiation in the treatment of patients with residual, nonmeasurable, intra-abdominal metastasis after undergoing resection for colorectal carcinoma.Cancer. 2001 Mar 1;91(5):1020-8. Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11251955 Clinical Trial.
-
Radioembolization as a Treatment Strategy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver: What Can We Learn from the SIRFLOX Trial?Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):26. doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0402-8. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27098532 Review.
-
Radioembolization in the treatment of unresectable liver tumors: experience across a range of primary cancers.Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr;35(2):167-77. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181f47923. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 21127414 Review.
Cited by
-
Gastrointestinal oncology--what you need to know.Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):575-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-575. Clin Med (Lond). 2012. PMID: 23342414 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Clinical Application of Trans-Arterial Radioembolization in Hepatic Malignancies in Europe: First Results from the Prospective Multicentre Observational Study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy (CIRT).Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Jan;44(1):21-35. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02642-y. Epub 2020 Sep 21. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32959085 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer concepts and principles: primer for the interventional oncologist-part II.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Aug;24(8):1167-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Jun 28. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23810312 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radioembolization as a Salvage Therapy for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors That Affect Outcomes.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015 Dec;14(4):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 27. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26277696 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale of transcatheter intra-arterial therapies of hepatic cancers.Hepat Oncol. 2014 Jun;1(3):285-291. doi: 10.2217/hep.14.11. Epub 2014 Sep 9. Hepat Oncol. 2014. PMID: 30190963 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
