Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;116(1):35-42.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e10c5c.

Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term

Deborah B Ehrenthal  1 , Xiaozhang Jiang, Donna M Strobino
Affiliations

Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term

Deborah B Ehrenthal et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the association of labor induction with the risk of a cesarean delivery for nulliparous women presenting at term at a regional hospital.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of cesarean delivery among nulliparous women delivering a live, singleton, vertex pregnancy at term. We used clinical data from electronic hospital obstetric records at a large, regional, obstetric hospital, approximating a population-based cohort. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore risk factors associated with cesarean delivery, and the fraction of cesarean deliveries attributable to the use of labor induction was estimated.

Results: From a cohort of 24,679 women, 7,804 met inclusion criteria. Labor induction was used in 43.6% of cases, 39.9% of which were elective. Use of labor induction was associated with an increased odds of cesarean delivery (crude odds ratio 2.67, 2.40-2.96) and the association remained significant (adjusted odds ratio 1.93, 1.71-2.2) after adjustment for maternal demographic characteristics, medical risk, and pregnancy complications. The contribution of labor induction to cesarean delivery in this cohort was estimated to be approximately 20%.

Conclusion: Labor induction is significantly associated with a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term for those with and without medical or obstetric complications. Reducing the use of elective labor induction may lead to decreased rates of cesarean delivery for a population.

Level of evidence: II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S. Births: Preliminary data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009;57(12):1–23.
    1. Ecker JL, Frigoletto FD Jr. Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus. N Engl J Med 2007;356:885–8.
    1. Zhang J, Yancey MK, Henderson CE. U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989–1998. J Reprod Med 2002;47:120–4.
    1. Kirby RS. Trends in labor induction in the United States: is it true that what goes up must come down? Birth 2004;31:148–51.
    1. Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:287–93.