Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;17(3):28-36.
doi: 10.3747/co.v17i3.494.

Multimodality breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition

Affiliations

Multimodality breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition

I Trop et al. Curr Oncol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Women with a predisposition for breast cancer require a tailored screening program for early cancer detection. We evaluated the performance of mammography (MG), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening in these women.

Patients and methods: In asymptomatic women either confirmed as BRCA1/2 carriers, or having a greater than 30% probability of being so as estimated by brcapro [Berry D, Parmigiani G. Duke SPORE (Specialized Program of Research Excellence) in Breast Cancer. 1999], we conducted a prospective comparative trial consisting of annual MRI and MG, and biannual US and clinical breast examination. All evaluations were done within 30 days of one another. For each screening round, imaging tests were independently interpreted by three radiologists.

Results: The study enrolled 184 women, and 387 screening rounds were performed, detecting 12 cancers (9 infiltrating, 3 in situ), for an overall cancer yield of 6.5%. At diagnosis, 7 infiltrating cancers were smaller than 2 cm (T1); only 1 woman presented with axillary nodal metastases. All tumours were negative for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Of the 12 cancers, MRI detected 10, and MG, 7; US did not identify any additional cancers. The overall recall rate after MRI was 21.8%, as compared with 11.4% for US and 16.1% for MG. Recall rates declined with successive screening rounds. In total, 45 biopsies were performed: 21 as a result of an US abnormality; 17, because of an MRI lesion; and 7, because of a MG anomaly.

Interpretation: In high-risk women, MRI offers the best sensitivity for breast cancer screening. The combination of yearly MRI and MG reached a negative predictive value of 100%. The recall rate is greatest with MRI, but declines for all modalities with successive screening rounds.

Keywords: BRCA1; BRCA2; Breast cancer; high-risk; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; screening; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Canadian Cancer Society Home > Canada-wide > About Cancer > Cancer Statistics > Statistics at a Glance > Breast Cancer Statistics [Web page]. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2009. [Available at: www.cancer.ca/canadawide/about%20cancer/cancer%20statistics/stats%20at%2...; cited June 9, 2009]
    1. Marcus JN, Watson P, Page DL, et al. BRCA2 hereditary breast carcinoma patho-phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997;44:275–7. - PubMed
    1. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:676–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miki Y, Swenson J, Shattuck–Eidens D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994;266:66–71. - PubMed
    1. Chappuis PO, Goffin J, Wong N, et al. Significant response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 related breast cancer. J Med Genet. 2002;39:608–10. - PMC - PubMed