Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
- PMID: 20567632
- PMCID: PMC2883240
- DOI: 10.4137/cmo.s4773
Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
Abstract
The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab. Recently, the roles of ER as a negative and HER2 as a positive indicator for chemotherapy have been established. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, but recent studies suggest that measurement of Ki67-positive cells during treatment will more effectively predict treatment efficacy for both anti-hormonal and chemotherapy. p53 mutations are found in 20-35% of human breast cancers and are associated with aggressive disease with poor clinical outcome when the DNA-binding domain is mutated. The utility of cyclin D1 as a predictor of breast cancer prognosis is controversial, but cyclin D1b overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Likewise, overexpression of the low molecular weight form of cyclin E1 protein predicts poor prognosis. Breast cancers from BRCA1/2 carriers often show high nuclear grades, negativity to ER/PR/HER2, and p53 mutations, and thus, are associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic values of other molecular markers, such as p14(ARF), TBX2/3, VEGF in breast cancer are also discussed. Careful evaluation of these biomarkers with current treatment modality is required to determine whether their measurement or monitoring offer significant clinical benefits.
Keywords: ARF; BRCA1/2; ER; HER2; Ki67; PR; TBX2/3; VEGF; breast cancer; cyclin D1; cyclin E; molecular marker; p53; prognosis.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Prognostic significance of pathologic complete response and Ki67 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Breast Cancer. 2015 Mar;22(2):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0474-2. Epub 2013 May 5. Breast Cancer. 2015. PMID: 23645542 Clinical Trial.
-
Power of PgR expression as a prognostic factor for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients at intermediate risk classified by the Ki67 labeling index.BMC Cancer. 2017 May 22;17(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3331-4. BMC Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28532429 Free PMC article.
-
The localization of pre mRNA splicing factor PRPF38B is a novel prognostic biomarker that may predict survival benefit of trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer overexpressing HER2.Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 18;8(68):112245-112257. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22496. eCollection 2017 Dec 22. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29348822 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging biomarkers and new understanding of traditional markers in personalized therapy for breast cancer.Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Dec 15;14(24):8019-26. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0974. Clin Cancer Res. 2008. PMID: 19088018 Review.
-
Potential prognostic tumor biomarkers in triple-negative breast carcinoma.Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Oct 18;44(5):666-72. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012. PMID: 23073572 Review.
Cited by
-
DMP1β, a splice isoform of the tumour suppressor DMP1 locus, induces proliferation and progression of breast cancer.J Pathol. 2015 May;236(1):90-102. doi: 10.1002/path.4504. Epub 2015 Feb 9. J Pathol. 2015. PMID: 25537728 Free PMC article.
-
Human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells limit breast cancer growth by modulating cell survival-, apoptosis-related molecules and microenvironment in tumors.Int J Cancer. 2013 Nov;133(9):2133-44. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28217. Epub 2013 May 29. Int J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23595559 Free PMC article.
-
Tumor suppression by the EGR1, DMP1, ARF, p53, and PTEN Network.Cancer Invest. 2018;36(9-10):520-536. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2018.1533965. Epub 2018 Nov 5. Cancer Invest. 2018. PMID: 30396285 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Prediction of BRCA Mutations by 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax in Breast Cancer.Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2021 Oct 15;30(3):158-168. doi: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.82584. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2021. PMID: 34658299 Free PMC article.
-
Role of hormone receptors and HER2 as prospective molecular markers for breast cancer: An update.Genes Dis. 2020 Dec 17;9(3):648-658. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.12.005. eCollection 2022 May. Genes Dis. 2020. PMID: 35782984 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Andreopoulou E, Hortobagyi GN. Prognostic Factors in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Successes and Challenges Toward Individualized Therapy. J Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:3660–2. - PubMed
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–49. - PubMed
-
- Masood S. Prognostic/predictive factors in breast cancer. Clin Lab Med. 2005;25:809–25. - PubMed
-
- Morrow PK, Hortobagyi GN. Management of breast cancer in the genome era. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:153–65. - PubMed
-
- Dickson RB, Lippman ME. Autocrine and paracrine growth factors in the normal and neoplastic breast. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, et al., editors. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 303.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous