Ankle fracture syndesmosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons
- PMID: 20567742
Ankle fracture syndesmosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons
Abstract
There is a wide variety of treatments for disruption of the syndesmosis. There is also controversy as to which device should be used for fixation of the syndesmosis, how many devices should be used, how many cortices the screws should engage, and whether, when, and where the screws should be removed. We conducted a study to determine how orthopedic surgeons manage these injuries. In a survey, we asked orthopedic trauma and foot and ankle fellowship directors and members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society how they routinely treated the syndesmotic injury component of Danis-Weber type C or Lauge-Hansen pronation-external rotation type IV ankle fractures. The overall response rate was 50% (77/153). Fifty-one percent of respondents routinely used 3.5-mm cortical screws, 24% routinely used 4.5-mm cortical screws, and 14% routinely used a suture fixation device. Forty-four percent of respondents routinely used 1 screw, 44% routinely used 2 screws, and the rest were undecided between 1 and 2 screws. Twenty-nine percent of respondents engaged 3 cortices with syndesmotic screws, and 67% engaged 4 cortices. Syndesmotic screws were routinely removed 65% of the time and left in place 35% of the time. Routine removal of syndesmotic screws was done in the operating room in 95% of cases; it was done at 3 months in 49% of cases, at 4 months in 37%, and at 6 months in 12%. The most common method for treating syndesmotic injuries was through use of 3.5-mm screws engaging 4 cortices routinely removed in the operating room at 3 months. Number of screws used to fix the syndesmosis, either 1 or 2, was evenly split.
Similar articles
-
The influence of the number of cortices of screw purchase and ankle position in Weber C ankle fracture fixation.J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Aug;22(7):473-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817ae635. J Orthop Trauma. 2008. PMID: 18670288
-
The management of acute distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: results of a nationwide survey.Injury. 2012 Oct;43(10):1718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Jul 15. Injury. 2012. PMID: 22795845
-
Functional outcomes following syndesmotic fixation: A comparison of screws retained in situ versus routine removal - Is it really necessary?Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Aug 20. Injury. 2013. PMID: 24021584
-
Evaluation and management of injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.Br Med Bull. 2014 Sep;111(1):101-15. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldu020. Br Med Bull. 2014. PMID: 25190761 Review.
-
Ankle fractures involving the fibula proximal to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.Foot Ankle Int. 1997 Aug;18(8):513-21. doi: 10.1177/107110079701800811. Foot Ankle Int. 1997. PMID: 9278748 Review.
Cited by
-
Hybrid Fixation Restores Tibiofibular Kinematics for Early Weightbearing After Syndesmotic Injury.Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Sep 9;8(9):2325967120946744. doi: 10.1177/2325967120946744. eCollection 2020 Sep. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32953921 Free PMC article.
-
Radiographic identification of the primary structures of the ankle syndesmosis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1187-99. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3743-0. Epub 2015 Aug 21. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. PMID: 26294053
-
Differences in gait analysis and clinical outcome after TightRope® or screw fixation in acute syndesmosis rupture: study protocol for a prospective randomized pilot study.Trials. 2020 Jul 2;21(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04550-5. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32616003 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic Fixation versus Static Screw Fixation for Syndesmosis Injuries in Pronation External Rotation Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Case Control Study.Malays Orthop J. 2023 Nov;17(3):48-58. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2311.008. Malays Orthop J. 2023. PMID: 38107359 Free PMC article.
-
Syndesmotic InternalBraceTM for anatomic distal tibiofibular ligament augmentation.World J Orthop. 2017 Apr 18;8(4):301-309. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i4.301. eCollection 2017 Apr 18. World J Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28473957 Free PMC article.