Paraphilic Coercive Disorder in the DSM: the right diagnosis for the right reasons
- PMID: 20567890
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-010-9645-9
Paraphilic Coercive Disorder in the DSM: the right diagnosis for the right reasons
Abstract
The recommendation to include a Paraphilic Coercive Disorder (PCD) diagnosis in the DSM-5 represents an improvement over current options and would lead to the shrinking of the pool of individuals considered for detention as Sexually Violent Predators. A precise description of the diagnostic criteria for PCD would permit psychologists and psychiatrists to use more specific and narrow criteria for those who seek sexual gratification by coercing others to engage in unwanted sexual behavior. This might permit mental health professionals to abandon the Paraphilia NOS designation in favor of the more defined PCD in appropriate cases. Various critics have attacked the proposal on what appears to be misplaced ideological grounds. Not only should ideological concerns not play a part in a scientific debate, but the critics' predictions of how the PCD diagnosis would play out in the legal arena are likely wrong. Paraphilic Coercive Disorder would give the judicial system the best opportunity to most accurately identify the small group of men who have previously committed, and are likely in the future to commit, this type of predatory sexual violence.
Comment in
-
Paraphilic coercive disorder does not belong in DSM-5 for statistical, historical, conceptual, and practical reasons.Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec;40(6):1097-8; author reply 1099-100. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9814-5. Arch Sex Behav. 2011. PMID: 21773842 No abstract available.
-
The debate about paraphilic coercive disorder is mostly ideological and going nowhere.Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Jun;41(3):535-6. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9892-4. Arch Sex Behav. 2012. PMID: 22218788 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases.J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):443-54. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008. PMID: 19092060 Review.
-
DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility.Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 May 4. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011. PMID: 21531463 Review.
-
Is a diagnostic category for paraphilic coercive disorder defensible?Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):419-26. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9571-x. Arch Sex Behav. 2010. PMID: 19888645 Review.
-
Paraphilia NOS, nonconsent: not ready for the courtroom.J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):555-61. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011. PMID: 22159984
-
Hebephilia is not a mental disorder in DSM-IV-TR and should not become one in DSM-5.J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(1):78-85. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011. PMID: 21389170
Cited by
-
What is a mental disorder? An exemplar-focused approach.Psychol Med. 2021 Apr;51(6):894-901. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001185. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Psychol Med. 2021. PMID: 33843505 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical and Conceptual Problems With Pedophilic Disorder in the DSM-5-TR.Arch Sex Behav. 2022 May;51(4):1833-1837. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02336-1. Epub 2022 Apr 26. Arch Sex Behav. 2022. PMID: 35471678 No abstract available.
-
Pornography, sex crime, and paraphilia.Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Jun;15(6):362. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0362-7. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013. PMID: 23636986 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources