Paraphilic Coercive Disorder in the DSM: the right diagnosis for the right reasons
- PMID: 20567890
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-010-9645-9
Paraphilic Coercive Disorder in the DSM: the right diagnosis for the right reasons
Abstract
The recommendation to include a Paraphilic Coercive Disorder (PCD) diagnosis in the DSM-5 represents an improvement over current options and would lead to the shrinking of the pool of individuals considered for detention as Sexually Violent Predators. A precise description of the diagnostic criteria for PCD would permit psychologists and psychiatrists to use more specific and narrow criteria for those who seek sexual gratification by coercing others to engage in unwanted sexual behavior. This might permit mental health professionals to abandon the Paraphilia NOS designation in favor of the more defined PCD in appropriate cases. Various critics have attacked the proposal on what appears to be misplaced ideological grounds. Not only should ideological concerns not play a part in a scientific debate, but the critics' predictions of how the PCD diagnosis would play out in the legal arena are likely wrong. Paraphilic Coercive Disorder would give the judicial system the best opportunity to most accurately identify the small group of men who have previously committed, and are likely in the future to commit, this type of predatory sexual violence.
Comment in
-
Paraphilic coercive disorder does not belong in DSM-5 for statistical, historical, conceptual, and practical reasons.Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec;40(6):1097-8; author reply 1099-100. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9814-5. Arch Sex Behav. 2011. PMID: 21773842 No abstract available.
-
The debate about paraphilic coercive disorder is mostly ideological and going nowhere.Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Jun;41(3):535-6. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9892-4. Arch Sex Behav. 2012. PMID: 22218788 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
