Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study
- PMID: 20567980
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1214-2
Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study
Abstract
Within this study a retrospective analysis of clinical voice perturbation measures, Dysphonia Severity Index and subjective perceived hoarseness was performed to determine their value under clinical aspects. The study included the data of 580 healthy and 1,700 pathologic voices, which were investigated under the following aspects. The relevant parameters were identified and their interrelation determined. Group differences between healthy and pathologic voices were figured out and investigated if voice quality measures allowed an automatic diagnosis of voice disorders. The analysis revealed significant changes between the clinical groups, which indicate the diagnostic relevance of voice quality measures. However, an individual diagnosis of the underlying voice disorder failed due to a vast spread of the parameter values within the respective groups. Classification accuracies of 75-90% were achieved. The high misclassification rate of up to 25% implied that in voice disorder diagnosis, the individual interpretation of the parameter values has to be done carefully.
Similar articles
-
[The Evaluation of Voice Quality via Signal Typing in Voice using Narrowband Spectrograms].Laryngorhinootologie. 2016 Feb;95(2):105-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1559678. Epub 2015 Oct 15. Laryngorhinootologie. 2016. PMID: 26468672 German.
-
[Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of hoarseness].Laryngorhinootologie. 2011 Feb;90(2):68-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272911. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Laryngorhinootologie. 2011. PMID: 21298598 German.
-
Characteristics of a Dysphonic Population Referred for Voice Assessment and/or Voice Therapy.Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(4):178-86. doi: 10.1159/000369339. Epub 2016 Jan 15. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015. PMID: 26766133
-
Diagnostic evaluation and management of hoarseness.Med Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;94(5):945-60. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2010.05.010. Med Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20736105 Review.
-
[Differential diagnosis of hoarseness].Laryngorhinootologie. 2014 Apr;93(4):263-84; quiz 285-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370937. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Laryngorhinootologie. 2014. PMID: 24683162 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Analysis of vocal fold function from acoustic data simultaneously recorded with high-speed endoscopy.J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):726-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 May 25. J Voice. 2012. PMID: 22632795 Free PMC article.
-
Male-female specific changes in voice parameters under varying room acoustics.Proc Meet Acoust. 2024 Nov 18;55(1):060001. doi: 10.1121/2.0001979. Epub 2024 Dec 11. Proc Meet Acoust. 2024. PMID: 40092624 No abstract available.
-
Diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls in benign vocal fold diseases.GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec 13;12:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/cto000093. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013. PMID: 24403969 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sensitivity of Acoustic Voice Quality Measures in Simulated Reverberation Conditions.Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;11(12):1253. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121253. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39768071 Free PMC article.
-
Interdependencies between acoustic and high-speed videoendoscopy parameters.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 2;16(2):e0246136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246136. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33529244 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical