Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke upper limb spasticity
- PMID: 20569068
- DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.497103
Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke upper limb spasticity
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of one-time injections of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) in Japanese patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity.
Research design and methods: In a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 109 patients with upper limb spasticity were randomised to receive a single treatment with lower-dose (120-150 U) or higher-dose (200-240 U) BoNTA or placebo into upper limb muscles.
Clinical trial registration: NCT00460564.
Main outcome measures: The tone of the wrist flexor was assessed at baseline and at weeks 0, 1, 4, 6, 8 and 12 using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) for wrist, finger, thumb and disability in activities of daily living (ADL) was rated using the 4-point Disability Assessment Scale (DAS). The primary endpoint was area under the curve (AUC) of the change from baseline in the MAS wrist score in the higher-dose groups.
Results: Subjects were randomised with 51 in the higher BoNTA group, 26 in the higher-dose placebo group, 21 in the lower BoNTA group and 11 in the lower-dose placebo group. Significant improvement in spasticity with higher-dose BoNTA was demonstrated by a mean difference in the AUC of the change from baseline in the MAS wrist score between the higher-dose BoNTA group and the higher-dose placebo group of -6.830 (p < 0.001, t-test), no significant different was demonstrated between the lower-dose BoNTA group and the lower-dose placebo group (p = 0.215, t-test). Significant improvements with higher-dose BoNTA were also observed in the DAS scores for limb position (p = 0.001-0.022) at all time points and dressing (p = 0.018-0.038, Wilcoxon test) at weeks 6, 8 and 12. No clinically relevant difference was noted in the frequency of treatment-related adverse events between BoNTA-treated and placebo-treated patients. The long-term efficacy and safety, and the effects on rehabilitation of BoNTA on upper limb will be evaluated using the data obtained in the open-label phase.
Conclusions: Higher-dose BoNTA reduced spasticity in upper limb muscles and improved ADL performance in terms of limb position and dressing. BoNTA is safe and effective in the treatment of post-stroke upper limb spasticity.
Similar articles
-
Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.J Neurol. 2010 Aug;257(8):1330-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5526-3. Epub 2010 Apr 1. J Neurol. 2010. PMID: 20358216 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A.Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(26):1-113, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14260. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20515600 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in upper limb spasticity in patients with stroke.Eur J Neurol. 2001 Nov;8(6):559-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00277.x. Eur J Neurol. 2001. PMID: 11784339 Clinical Trial.
-
Botulinum Toxin Type A for Upper Limb Spasticity in Poststroke Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jun;29(6):104682. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104682. Epub 2020 Apr 15. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020. PMID: 32305277 Review.
-
Effectiveness of botulinum toxin A for upper and lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: a summary of evidence.J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2009 Mar;116(3):319-31. doi: 10.1007/s00702-008-0175-8. Epub 2009 Jan 14. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2009. PMID: 19142573 Review.
Cited by
-
Botulinum toxin treatment in neurological practice: how much does it really cost? A prospective cost-effectiveness study.J Neurol. 2011 Sep;258(9):1670-5. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-5998-9. Epub 2011 Mar 20. J Neurol. 2011. PMID: 21424611
-
Direct central action of intramuscularly injected botulinum toxin: is it harmful or beneficial?J Physiol. 2013 Feb 15;591(4):749. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.246322. J Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23418371 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Sep 13;10:442. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27679565 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of botulinum toxin for movement disorders.Drugs Context. 2019 Jun 18;8:212586. doi: 10.7573/dic.212586. eCollection 2019. Drugs Context. 2019. PMID: 31258617 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spotlight on botulinum toxin and its potential in the treatment of stroke-related spasticity.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Mar 8;10:1085-99. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S80804. eCollection 2016. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016. PMID: 27022247 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical