Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;5(2):57-64.
doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.57.

Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research

Affiliations

Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research

Mary A Ott et al. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

An understanding of why parents provide consent for adolescent participation in research on sensitive topics can inform and improve the ethical conduct and review of such research. As part of a longitudinal study of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in lower-income adolescents, we asked 134 parents why they permitted their daughter to participate, analyzing responses using qualitative methods. Over half described participation benefits, providing reasons such as the study being generally good for their daughters, sex education, someone to talk to, and STI testing. Other reasons included positive interactions and familiarity with research and clinical staff, friend or family member participation, and adolescent autonomy in making the decision to participate. If parents perceived their daughter to be "at risk" in some way, such as for STI or pregnancy, they were more likely to cite participation benefits. These data can be used to make such research more sensitive to family and community needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annett RD, Brody JL, Scherer DG, Perkett EA. Perception of risk associated with asthma research procedures among adolescents, parents, and pediatricians. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2004;114(5):1138–1145. - PubMed
    1. Borzekowski DL, Rickert VI, Ipp L, Fortenberry JD. At what price? The current state of subject payment in adolescent research. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2003;33(5):378–384. - PubMed
    1. Brody JL, Annett RD, Scherer DG, Perryman ML, Cofrin KM. Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and aboveminimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2005;37(3):229–235. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brody JL, Scherer DG, Annett RD, Turner C, Dalen J. Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: The effects of adolescent gender and research risk. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):e356–e362. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Federal Register. 1979;44(76):23191–23197. - PubMed

Publication types