Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of frequent optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Frequent Optimization Study Using the QuickOpt Method (FREEDOM) trial
- PMID: 20569704
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.034
Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of frequent optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Frequent Optimization Study Using the QuickOpt Method (FREEDOM) trial
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to describe the rationale, design, and end points of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial evaluating frequent systematic optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Methods: One thousand five hundred eighty heart failure patients, with standard clinical indications for CRT, were enrolled at 178 sites in 16 countries. Within 2 weeks after implantation of a CRT system capable of using a new device-based algorithm for AV and VV optimization, patients were randomly assigned to frequent optimization arm versus empiric device programming or any other non-device-based method of CRT optimization (standard of care arm). In patients in the frequent optimization arm, the AV and VV delays were calculated, reevaluated, and, if necessary, reprogrammed every 3 months. In patients in the standard of care arm, device programming was left to the implanting physician's discretion and remained unchanged throughout the trial unless mandated by a change in clinical status. The primary end point of the trial is the heart failure clinical composite, which classifies patients as worsened, unchanged, or improved based on prespecified definitions. Secondary end points include hospitalizations for cardiovascular reasons and all-cause mortality. End points are adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to study assignment.
Conclusions: The FREEDOM trial, expected to conclude late in 2009, will determine whether frequent optimization of CRT, using a new device-based algorithm, is associated with better clinical outcomes than current standard of care. In addition to improving patient care, this approach might alleviate the workload and economic burden imposed by current approaches to optimization of CRT devices.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00418314.
Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction with previous symptoms or mild heart failure--the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study.Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.002. Am Heart J. 2006. PMID: 16442890
-
Optimization of AV and VV delays in the real-world CRT patient population: an international survey on current clinical practice.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S236-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02294.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19250104
-
Automatic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy using SonR-rationale and design of the clinical trial of the SonRtip lead and automatic AV-VV optimization algorithm in the paradym RF SonR CRT-D (RESPOND CRT) trial.Am Heart J. 2014 Apr;167(4):429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 19. Am Heart J. 2014. PMID: 24655689 Review.
-
A novel algorithm for individualized cardiac resynchronization therapy: rationale and design of the adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy trial.Am Heart J. 2012 May;163(5):747-752.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.02.007. Am Heart J. 2012. PMID: 22607850 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: device-based medicine for heart failure.J Card Surg. 2004 May-Jun;19(3):270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04081.x. J Card Surg. 2004. PMID: 15151661 Review.
Cited by
-
Brazilian Guidelines for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices - 2023.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jan 23;120(1):e20220892. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220892. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36700596 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese. No abstract available.
-
T-wave oversensing due to left ventricle-only pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization algorithm.HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018 Jun 5;4(9):401-404. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2018.05.009. eCollection 2018 Sep. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018. PMID: 30228964 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Role of Echocardiography in the Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2017 Dec 19;11:133-145. doi: 10.2174/1874192401711010133. eCollection 2017. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2017. PMID: 29387277 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The risk of delayed atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction block following ablation of bundle branch reentry.Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Feb;102(2):145-53. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0509-2. Epub 2012 Sep 27. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23015015
-
Orthodromic and Antidromic Snare Techniques for Left Ventricular Lead Implantation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 11;11(8):2133. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082133. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35456225 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials