Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections
- PMID: 20570305
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.002
Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections
Abstract
Background: Robotic surgery is gaining popularity for digestive surgery; however, its use for liver surgery is reported scarcely. This article reviews a surgeon's experience with the use of robotic surgery for liver resections.
Methods: From March 2002 to March 2009, 70 robotic liver resections were performed at 2 different centers by a single surgeon. The surgical procedure and postoperative outcome data were reviewed retrospectively.
Results: Malignant tumors were indications for resections in 42 (60%) patients, whereas benign tumors were indications in 28 (40%) patients. The median age was 60 years (range, 21-84) and 57% of patients were female. Major liver resections (≥ 3 liver segments) were performed in 27 (38.5%) patients. There were 4 conversions to open surgery (5.7%). The median operative time for a major resection was 313 min (range, 220-480) and 198 min (range, 90-459) for minor resection. The median blood loss was 150 mL (range, 20-1,800) for minor resection and 300 mL (range, 100-2,000) for major resection. The mortality rate was 0%, and the overall rate of complications was 21%. Major morbidity occurred in 4 patients in the major hepatectomies group (14.8%) and in 4 patients in the minor hepatectomies group (9.3%). All complications were managed conservatively and none required reoperation.
Conclusion: This preliminary experience shows that robotic surgery can be used safely for liver resections with a limited conversion rate, blood loss, and postoperative morbidity. Robotics offers a new technical option for minimally invasive liver surgery.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.Int J Urol. 2009 Mar;16(3):244-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02232.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20. Int J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19207612 Review.
-
Tolerance of radiofrequency ablation by patients of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(5):655-60. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0103-9. Epub 2009 Apr 17. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009. PMID: 19370304
-
Comparison of open and minimally invasive thymectomies at a single institution.Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):589-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.001. Am J Surg. 2010. PMID: 20466100
-
Robotic fundoplication in children: resident teaching and a single institutional review of our first 50 patients.J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Dec;42(12):2022-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.08.022. J Pediatr Surg. 2007. PMID: 18082700
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Feb;85(2):S768-71. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.079. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18222214 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery?Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;14(17):4268. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174268. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36077803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances and challenges in laparoscopic surgery in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec 27;9(12):233-245. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i12.233. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017. PMID: 29359029 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective.Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017 Aug;6(4):239-245. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.12.05. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28848746 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery.Chirurg. 2017 Jan;88(Suppl 1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0223-0. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 27481268 Review. English.
-
Laparoscopic surgery of postero-lateral segments: a comparison between transthoracic and abdominal approach.Updates Surg. 2015 Jun;67(2):141-5. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0320-5. Epub 2015 Jul 12. Updates Surg. 2015. PMID: 26164141 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical