Cytotoxicity of orthodontic bonding adhesive resins on human oral fibroblasts
- PMID: 20570954
- DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq019
Cytotoxicity of orthodontic bonding adhesive resins on human oral fibroblasts
Abstract
There is little information concerning the cytotoxic effects of no-mix and flowable adhesives used in orthodontics. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of a no-mix (Unite), a light-cured (Tranbond XT), and a flowable (Denfil Flow) adhesives on human oral fibroblasts. Twelve discs of each adhesive were prepared and aged for 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM). Cell viability was assessed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the difference between the groups was tested by analysis of variance and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). After 1 day of storage, the no-mix adhesive showed moderate cytotoxic effects (P < 0.05), while the light-cured and flowable adhesives were essentially non-cytotoxic. Ageing considerably reduced the cytotoxicity of the no-mix adhesive. On days 5 and 7 of the experiment, the cell viability of three adhesives did not differ significantly (P > 0.05), but cell viability was slightly reduced on day 7. Moderate cytotoxic effects of no-mix adhesive on the first day of the experiment suggest that care should be taken to protect dentists and patients when these adhesives are being handled. Despite higher resin components, the flowable adhesive showed excellent biocompatibility.
Similar articles
-
Real-time cell analysis of the cytotoxicity of the components of orthodontic acrylic materials on gingival fibroblasts.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):e243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.05.019. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011. PMID: 22051502
-
Light-cured or chemically cured orthodontic adhesive resins? A selection based on the degree of cure, monomer leaching, and cytotoxicity.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Apr;127(4):413-9; quiz 516. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.015. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005. PMID: 15821685
-
An evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of orthodontic bonding adhesives upon a primary human oral gingival fibroblast culture and a permanent, human oral cancer-cell line.J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(6):814-21. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10412. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002. PMID: 12418029
-
The influence of various light curing units on the cytotoxicity of dental adhesives.Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.016. Epub 2009 Jul 31. Dent Mater. 2009. PMID: 19647309
-
Biocompatibility evaluation of orthodontic composite by real-time cell analysis.Hum Exp Toxicol. 2016 Aug;35(8):833-8. doi: 10.1177/0960327115607944. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2016. PMID: 26429931
Cited by
-
Orthodontic aligners: between passion and science.Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Jan 5;28(6):e23spe6. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.6.e23spe6. eCollection 2024. Dental Press J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 38198351 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Cell Viability and Chemical Composition of Six Latest Generation Orthodontic Wires.Int J Biomater. 2021 Jan 27;2021:8885290. doi: 10.1155/2021/8885290. eCollection 2021. Int J Biomater. 2021. PMID: 33574848 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the toxic potential of Bisphenol-A glycidylmethacrylate (BisGMA) on the third instar larvae of transgenic Drosophila.Toxicol Res (Camb). 2024 Mar 4;13(2):tfae026. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfae026. eCollection 2024 Apr. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2024. PMID: 38450176 Free PMC article.
-
Cytotoxicity assessment of different clear aligner systems: An in vitro study.Angle Orthod. 2022 Sep 1;92(5):655-660. doi: 10.2319/121621-919.1. Epub 2022 Jun 7. Angle Orthod. 2022. PMID: 35666210 Free PMC article.
-
Microencapsulation of Erlotinib and Nanomagnetite Supported in Chitosan as Potential Oncologic Carrier.Polymers (Basel). 2021 Apr 12;13(8):1244. doi: 10.3390/polym13081244. Polymers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33921305 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical