Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection
- PMID: 20571801
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1860-1
Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound (CECD-US) targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy (SB) for PCa detection in 1,776 men.
Methods: Retrospective, single-centre, diagnostic accuracy study from 2002 until 2006 in 1,776 male volunteers with a serum total PSA of 1.25 ng/ml or greater. In each patient five CECD-US targeted biopsies were performed in hypervascular areas in the peripheral zone during intravenous injection of a second-generation microbubble US contrast agent. Subsequently, another examiner performed ten SBs. The PCa detection rates for the two techniques were compared.
Results: Of 1,776 patients, cancer was detected in 559 patients (31%), including 476 of the 1,776 patients (27%) with CECD-US and 410 (23%) with SB (p < 0.001). The detection rate for CECD-US targeted biopsy cores (10.8% or 961 of 8,880 cores) was significantly better than for SB cores (5.1% or 910 of 17,760 cores, p < 0.001). Among patients with a positive biopsy for PCa, cancer was detected by CECD-US alone in 149 patients (27%) and by SB alone in 83 (15%) (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study represents the largest clinical trial to date, demonstrating a significant benefit of CECD-US targeted biopsy relative to SB.
Similar articles
-
Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy.J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):1926-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158444.56199.03. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15879783
-
Colour Doppler and microbubble contrast agent ultrasonography do not improve cancer detection rate in transrectal systematic prostate biopsy sampling.BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1723-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10199.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 21756276 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective randomized trial comparing contrast-enhanced targeted versus systematic ultrasound guided biopsies: impact on prostate cancer detection.Prostate. 2007 Oct 1;67(14):1537-42. doi: 10.1002/pros.20639. Prostate. 2007. PMID: 17705242 Clinical Trial.
-
Ultrasound of prostate cancer: recent advances.Eur Radiol. 2008 Apr;18(4):707-15. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0779-7. Epub 2007 Oct 16. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 17938936 Review.
-
A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.Eur Radiol. 2006 Apr;16(4):927-38. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0035-y. Epub 2006 Jan 4. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16391907 Review.
Cited by
-
[Imaging of the prostate].Urologe A. 2013 Apr;52(4):490-6. doi: 10.1007/s00120-012-3103-3. Urologe A. 2013. PMID: 23494334 German.
-
Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 27;12:905087. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.905087. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35832558 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Usefulness of perflubutane microbubble-enhanced ultrasound in imaging and detection of prostate cancer: phase II multicenter clinical trial.World J Urol. 2013 Oct;31(5):1123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0833-1. Epub 2012 Feb 4. World J Urol. 2013. PMID: 22311543 Clinical Trial.
-
Doppler spectral waveform parameters at neurovascular bundle vessels in patients with prostate biopsy.J Endourol. 2014 Mar;28(3):364-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0383. Epub 2013 Dec 28. J Endourol. 2014. PMID: 24168710 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):661-676. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03193-0. Epub 2020 Apr 18. World J Urol. 2021. PMID: 32306060
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous