Canalicular stenosis following probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
- PMID: 2057187
Canalicular stenosis following probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Abstract
A canalicular stenosis was identified in 29 of 66 (44%) children and 35 of 80 (44%) lacrimal drainage systems undergoing silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, having previously had unsuccessful probings. The stenoses were equally divided between boys and girls and between right and left sides. There was no significant difference in age at the time of probing, number of prior probings, or age at intubation between children with and without canalicular stenosis. Stenoses may be congenital or acquired as a result of faulty probing. Any child undergoing a second lacrimal procedure after a failed probing should be evaluated for evidence of a canalicular stenosis. If a stenosis is present, a silicone stent should be placed to try to salvage the canaliculus.
Similar articles
-
Use of a modified monocanalicular silicone stent in 33 eyelids.Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996 Nov;27(11):929-34. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996. PMID: 8938801
-
[Lacrimal intubation with the Ritleng system in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Oct;44(10):887-91. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2008. PMID: 19176115 Chinese.
-
[Lacrimal duct probing in young children with a congenital lacrimal duct obstruction at the Utrecht University Medical Center: generally an effective treatment].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Apr 19;147(16):764-8. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003. PMID: 12731469 Dutch.
-
Pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;24(5):421-4. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283642e94. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23846190 Review.
-
Controversies of the lacrimal system.Surv Ophthalmol. 2016 May-Jun;61(3):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 26700821 Review.
Cited by
-
[Minimally invasive diagnostics and therapy of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction].Ophthalmologe. 2017 May;114(5):397-408. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0472-4. Ophthalmologe. 2017. PMID: 28258301 Review. German.
-
The rate of symptomatic improvement of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Japanese infants treated with conservative management during the 1st year of age.Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;2(2):291-4. doi: 10.2147/opth.s2582. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 19668718 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes and comparison of nasolacrimal probing for patients older than 12 months.Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 26;12:2515841420927138. doi: 10.1177/2515841420927138. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32647780 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Office-Based Probing with Dacryoendoscopy for Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Retrospective Study.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 12;12(22):7048. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227048. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38002662 Free PMC article.
-
Probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoendoscope.Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 May 16;8:977-80. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S60377. eCollection 2014. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24876765 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical