Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 28;16(24):3011-5.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i24.3011.

Management of recto-vaginal fistulas after prosthetic reinforcement treatment for pelvic organ prolapse

Mehdi Ouaïssi  1 , Silvia Cresti, Urs Giger, Igor Sielezneff, Nicolas Pirrò, Bruno Berthet, Philippe Grandval, Bernard Consentino, Bernard Sastre
Affiliations

Management of recto-vaginal fistulas after prosthetic reinforcement treatment for pelvic organ prolapse

Mehdi Ouaïssi et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To communicate our findings on successful treatment of recto-vaginal fistulas (RVFs) after prosthetic reinforcement surgery of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods: A retrospective single center study between 1998 and 2008 was performed. A total of 80 patients with RVF were identified, of which five patients (6%), with a mean age of 65 years (range: 52-73), had undergone previous surgery for POP with prosthetic reinforcement.

Results: All patients complained about ongoing vaginal infections and febrile episodes. These symptoms were reported after a mean period of 18 mo after POP repair. As a first intervention, three patients underwent ablation of the prosthetic material (PM). As a second intervention, open proctectomy with a primary anastomosis, an omental patch, and a protective ileostomy were performed in two patients. One patient required a terminal colostomy due to complete destruction of the anal sphincters. In two other patients, ablation of the PM and proctectomy was performed as a one-step procedure. The postoperative course in all patients was uneventful, with a mean length of hospitalization of 20 d (range: 15-30). Closure of the ileostomy was achieved in all four patients within four months. After a mean period of 35 mo (range: 4-60) of follow-up, no recurrence was observed with normal continence in four patients.

Conclusion: In our experience, the definitive treatment of high RVFs after PM repair for POP necessitates ablation of the PM, proctectomy with a primary colo-rectal anastomosis, an omental patch interposition, and a temporary ileostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a transverse section of patient No. 3 with a complex recto-vaginal fistula (RVF) and destruction of the anal sphincter complex. The black arrows show a collection of 8.1 mm with complete destruction of the anal sphincter.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Colonoscopy. Recto-vaginal fistula (arrow) due to polypropylene mesh erosion and migration into the rectum.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beer M, Kuhn A. Surgical techniques for vault prolapse: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;119:144–155. - PubMed
    1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–506. - PubMed
    1. Savary D, Fatton B, Velemir L, Amblard J, Jacquetin B. [What about transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse? Review of the literature since the HAS (French Health Authorities) report] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2009;38:11–41. - PubMed
    1. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007:CD004014. - PubMed
    1. Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C. Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG. 2009;116:15–24. - PubMed

Publication types