Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):762-4.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0417. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

Kin recognition and adjustment of reproductive effort in zebra finches

Affiliations

Kin recognition and adjustment of reproductive effort in zebra finches

Aneta Arct et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

The differential allocation theory predicts that females should invest more in offspring produced with attractive partners, and a number of studies support this prediction in birds. Females have been shown to increase reproductive investment when mated to males showing elaborated sexual traits. However, mate attractiveness might also depend on the interaction between male and female genotypes. Accordingly, females should invest more in offspring sired by individuals that are genetically dissimilar or carry superior alleles. Here, we show in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) that pairs of unfamiliar genetic brothers and sisters are less likely to reproduce in comparison with randomly mated pairs. Among the brother-sister pairs, those that attempted to breed laid smaller clutches and of lower total clutch mass. Our results provide the first experimental evidence that females adjust their reproductive effort in response to the genetic similarity of their partners. Importantly, these results imply a female ability to assess relatedness of a social mate without prior association.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean ± s.e. clutch size produced by females mated to their unfamiliar brothers (inbred group) and mated to unfamiliar, unrelated male (control group).

References

    1. Andersson M.1994Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
    1. Balzer A. L., Williams T. D.1998Do female zebra finches vary primary reproductive effort in relation to mate attractiveness? Behaviour 35, 297–309
    1. Bateson P. P. G.1982Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature 295, 236–237 (doi:10.1038/295236a0) - DOI
    1. Bolund E., Martin K., Kempenaers B., Forstmeier W.2010Inbreeding depression of sexually selected traits and attractiveness in the zebra finch. Anim. Behav. 1, 1–9 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.014) - DOI
    1. Burley N.1988The differential-allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 132, 611–628 (doi:10.1086/284877) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources