Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul-Aug;43(4):346-56.
doi: 10.1177/0022219410369083. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

A short report: Word-level phonological and lexical characteristics interact to influence phoneme awareness

Affiliations

A short report: Word-level phonological and lexical characteristics interact to influence phoneme awareness

Tiffany P Hogan. J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

In this study, we examined the influence of word-level phonological and lexical characteristics on early phoneme awareness. Typically developing children, ages 61 to 78 months, completed a phoneme-based, odd-one-out task that included consonant-vowel-consonant word sets (e.g., "chair-chain-ship") that varied orthogonally by a phonological characteristic, sound contrast similarity (similar vs. dissimilar), and a lexical characteristic, neighborhood density (dense vs. sparse). In a subsample of the participants-those with the highest vocabularies-results were in line with a predicted interactive effect of phonological and lexical characteristics on phoneme awareness performance: word sets contrasting similar sounds were less likely to yield correct responses in words from sparse neighborhoods than words from dense neighborhoods. Word sets contrasting dissimilar sounds were most likely to yield correct responses regardless of the words' neighborhood density. Based on these findings, theories of early phoneme awareness should consider both word-level and child-level influences on performance. Attention to these influences is predicted to result in more sensitive and specific measures of reading risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number correct by test word conditions. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Graph includes data for participants in the high vocabulary group (n = 10).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number correct by test word conditions. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Graph includes data for participants in the low vocabulary group (n = 11).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams MJ. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
    1. Anthony JL, Lonigan CJ, Burgess SR, Driscoll K, Phillips BM, Cantor BG. Structure of preschool phonological sensitivity: Overlapping sensitivity to rhyme, words, syllables, and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2002;82:65–92. - PubMed
    1. ASHA. Guidelines for audiologic screening. Rockville, MD: Author; 1997.
    1. Bradley L, Bryant P. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature. 1983;301:419–421.
    1. Brownell R. Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications; 2000a.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources