This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 2010 Jul;256(1):15-20.

doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100057.

The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines ignore important scientific evidence and should be revised or withdrawn

Daniel B Kopans¹

Affiliations

PMID: 20574081
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100057

The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines ignore important scientific evidence and should be revised or withdrawn

Daniel B Kopans. Radiology. 2010 Jul.

. 2010 Jul;256(1):15-20.

doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100057.

Author

Daniel B Kopans¹

Affiliation

¹ Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Suite 219, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

PMID: 20574081
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100057

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Omissions of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Zuurbier RA. Zuurbier RA. Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):305; author reply 305-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10102097. Radiology. 2011. PMID: 21436102 No abstract available.
Breast cancer screening: from science to recommendation.
Petitti DB, Calonge N, LeFevre ML, Melnyk BM, Wilt TJ, Schwartz JS; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Petitti DB, et al. Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):8-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100559. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20574080 No abstract available.
The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.
Squiers LB, Holden DJ, Dolina SE, Kim AE, Bann CM, Renaud JM. Squiers LB, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027. Am J Prev Med. 2011. PMID: 21496748
Breast cancer screening methods: a review of the evidence.
Vahabi M. Vahabi M. Health Care Women Int. 2003 Nov;24(9):773-93. doi: 10.1080/07399330390229957. Health Care Women Int. 2003. PMID: 14742116 Review.
Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
Lisby MD. Lisby MD. Am Fam Physician. 2004 Nov 1;70(9):1750-2. Am Fam Physician. 2004. PMID: 15554494 Review. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Translating biomarkers to clinical practice.
Perlis RH. Perlis RH. Mol Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;16(11):1076-87. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.63. Epub 2011 Jun 28. Mol Psychiatry. 2011. PMID: 21709685 Free PMC article. Review.
Breast cancer and screening in American Indian and Alaska Native women.
Roubidoux MA. Roubidoux MA. J Cancer Educ. 2012 Apr;27(1 Suppl):S66-72. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0323-6. J Cancer Educ. 2012. PMID: 22351427
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Detected on Whole-Breast Screening Ultrasound.
Nam SY, Ko EY, Han BK, Shin JH, Ko ES, Hahn SY. Nam SY, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2016 Sep;19(3):301-307. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.301. Epub 2016 Sep 23. J Breast Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27721880 Free PMC article.
Modeling the impact of population screening on breast cancer mortality in the United States.
Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Berry DA, Chang Y, de Koning HJ, Lee SJ, Plevritis SK, Schechter CB, Stout NK, van Ravesteyn NT, Zelen M, Feuer EJ. Mandelblatt JS, et al. Breast. 2011 Oct;20 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S75-81. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(11)70299-5. Breast. 2011. PMID: 22015298 Free PMC article.
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
Kopans DB. Kopans DB. Oncologist. 2014 Feb;19(2):107-12. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0184. Oncologist. 2014. PMID: 24536051 Free PMC article.

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Atypon
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information