Single bone intramedullary fixation of the ulna in pediatric both bone forearm fractures: analysis of short-term clinical and radiographic results
- PMID: 20574256
- DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181e00c44
Single bone intramedullary fixation of the ulna in pediatric both bone forearm fractures: analysis of short-term clinical and radiographic results
Abstract
Background: Although single bone intramedullary (IM) fixation has been advocated in the treatment of unstable diaphyseal forearm fractures, some reports have questioned the ability of single bone fixation to maintain adequate reduction. The purpose of this investigation is to report the radiographic and early clinical results of single bone IM fixation for diaphyseal forearm fractures and to identify factors leading to loss of reduction of the radius after ulnar fixation.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 38 children who underwent single bone IM fixation of the ulna for both bone forearm fractures was performed. Mean age was 9 years (range: 4-14 y). Preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up radiographs were examined for radiographic alignment. Patient data (including age, fracture type, delay to fixation, open vs. percutaneous reduction and fixation, and time to implant removal) was collected to identify predictors for loss of reduction of the radius. Loss of reduction of the radius was defined as 10 degrees or greater change of angulation in either the frontal or lateral plane from initial postoperative radiographs to final follow-up. Multivariate analysis was used to determine associations between patient factors and loss of reduction.
Results: All patients went on to bony union with restoration of forearm rotation. Twenty-five patients (66%) healed with <10 degrees of angulation of the radius, whereas 11 patients (29%) had between 10 and 20 degrees of angulation at final follow-up. Two patients demonstrated greater than 20 degrees of radial angulation requiring additional surgical care. There was no statistically significant association between any patient factors and loss of radial reduction, though there was a trend for increased radial angulation in patients who had sustained open fractures.
Conclusions: Single-bone IM fixation of the ulna is a safe and efficacious option for the treatment of unstable diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. Owing to the increased risk of loss of radial reduction, however, consideration should be made for IM fixation of both bones in older children and cases of open fractures.
Level of evidence: IV, therapeutic.
Similar articles
-
Flexible Intramedullary Nailing of Forearm Fractures at the Distal Metadiaphyseal Junction in Adolescents.Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Mar;9(1):101-108. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.1.101. Epub 2017 Feb 13. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017. PMID: 28261435 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of fixation methods in adolescent patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures.Injury. 2018 Nov;49(11):2053-2057. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Aug 30. Injury. 2018. PMID: 30220635
-
[Intramedullary pinning of diaphyseal fractures of both forearm bones in adults: 46 cases].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Apr;94(2):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2007.11.006. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008. PMID: 18420060 French.
-
Systematic review: functional outcomes and complications of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures in children.Injury. 2014 Aug;45(8):1135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 May 2. Injury. 2014. PMID: 24845408
-
Adult diaphyseal forearm fractures: intramedullary nail versus plate fixation.J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Jul;36(7):1216-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.020. Epub 2011 May 14. J Hand Surg Am. 2011. PMID: 21571446 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
[Fractures of the upper limbs in childhood and adolescence].Chirurg. 2017 May;88(5):451-466. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0420-5. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 28409214 Review. German.
-
Single Bone Fixation versus Both Bone Fixation for Pediatric Unstable Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.Indian J Orthop. 2018 Sep-Oct;52(5):529-535. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_125_17. Indian J Orthop. 2018. PMID: 30237611 Free PMC article.
-
Navigating Challenges and Treatment Options in Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures Among Adolescents: Case Series and Narrative Review.Cureus. 2023 Jun 19;15(6):e40669. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40669. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37485145 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of operating time, fluoroscopy exposure time, and functional and radiological results of two surgical methods for distal forearm fractures of both-bones in pediatric patients: Is it necessary to fix both bones?Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Mar;54(2):155-160. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.10. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020. PMID: 32254031 Free PMC article.
-
Flexible Intramedullary Nailing of Forearm Fractures at the Distal Metadiaphyseal Junction in Adolescents.Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Mar;9(1):101-108. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.1.101. Epub 2017 Feb 13. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017. PMID: 28261435 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials