Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 May;18(2):89-96.
doi: 10.1055/s-2004-829043.

Reconstruction of the breast conservation deformity

Affiliations

Reconstruction of the breast conservation deformity

Sumner A Slavin et al. Semin Plast Surg. 2004 May.

Abstract

The era of breast conserving treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma has created reconstructive challenges for the plastic surgeon. Although good to excellent cosmetic outcomes occur in the majority of patients, a significant number could benefit from additional reconstructive measures. Because of the need for continuing surveillance following breast-conserving therapy, estimated at 5-10% after fifteen years, plastic surgeons should choose techniques that do not interfere with the detection of recurrent breast carcinoma. Myocutaneous flaps-in particular, the latissimus dorsi and transverse rectus abdominis-have fulfilled the reconstructive needs of these patients by providing well-vascularized soft tissue. Postoperative radiological evaluation has demonstrated that these flaps are radiolucent, unlike breast implants that can obscure accurate mammographic interpretation.Myocutaneous flaps have been used for both immediate and delayed reconstruction of post-breast conservation deformities. The delayed approach offers the benefit of an established contour deformity that usually involves cutaneous, parenchymal, and nipple-areolar components. Moderate overcorrection of the defect has been advocated in anticipation of ongoing postradiation wound contraction and fibrosis. Immediate reconstruction of lumpectomy and partial mastectomy defects permits wider initial excision of the breast lesion, but can be compromised by positive histological margins. Long-term results suggest stability of the aesthetic outcome following reconstruction of delayed deformities.

Keywords: Reconstruction; breast; conservation; deformity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Preoperative view of a 56-year-old woman who had excision of right nipple-areolar complex and quadrantectomy for breast cancer. (B) Result 1 year after surgery following reconstruction of the partial mastectomy defect with an ipsilateral midabdominal transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Preoperative view of a 37-year-old woman with right breast loss of volume and tethering dislocation of nipple-areolar complex. (B) Postoperative view 10 years after reconstruction with a right latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. (C, left side) Preoperative mammographic image on left demonstrates breast conservation defect with volume loss and increased opacification of the breast caused by scar tissue. (C, right side) Postoperative mammographic appearance after placement of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (enclosed by wire). The flap has restored breast volume and contour, and the flap appears as fibrofatty tissue radiologically.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Preoperative view of a 37-year-old female with breast conservation defect characterized by nipple-areolar retraction, significant parenchymal volume loss, and skin stigmata with discoloration and telangiectasia. (B) Preoperative close-up view of the left breast conservation defect. (C) Appearance of the patient 1 year following reconstruction of the left breast conservation deformity with a left latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. No implant was placed in the left, but a subpectoral breast augmentation was performed in the right.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Preoperative view of a 48-year-old woman with a lateral breast defect after breast conservation. The patient developed restricted range of motion of the left shoulder following radiation therapy. (B) Appearance of the patient 1 year after surgery. Range of motion at the left shoulder was improved after reconstruction of the breast conservation defect with a left latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. (C) Postoperative view 1 year after reconstruction. (D) Postoperative view 15 years after reconstruction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Halsted W S. The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1907;66:1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher E R, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:674–681. - PubMed
    1. Jacobson J A, Danforth D N, Cowan K H, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–911. - PubMed
    1. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Delvecchio M, et al. Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: long term results. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986;22:1085–1089. - PubMed
    1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–1232. - PubMed