Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jun;16(5):543-50.
doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0139.

Telephone-based psychiatric referral-care management intervention health outcomes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Telephone-based psychiatric referral-care management intervention health outcomes

Faika Zanjani et al. Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of a telephone-based referral-care management (TBR-CM) intervention on psychiatric health outcomes.

Materials and methods: Between September 2005 and May 2006, primary care patients (n = 169) at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center completed a psychiatric interview over the telephone, of which 113 gave consent and were randomized into the TBR-CM usual care or intervention groups (n = 40 [39%] depression, n = 40 [39%] substance abuse, and n = 33 [22%] comorbid condition: depression and substance abuse). Usual care consisted of participants receiving a psychiatric appointment, followed up with standard institutional reminders. The intervention care group received the same, with the addition of brief motivational telephone sessions. Baseline and 6-month interviews were used to obtain study data.

Results: Results indicated that there was improvement in mental health functioning (p < 0.0001), depression (p < 0.0001), and binge (p < 0.0332) outcomes over the 6-month interview (78% retention). However, there was no change observed for physical health functioning and drinks per week outcomes. For mental health functioning, depression, and binge rates there were no randomization group assignment effects, indicating that the intervention care group did not show better health outcomes despite showing higher levels of psychiatric appointment attendance.

Conclusions: Patients who are exposed to the intervention have similar health outcomes as patients in usual care. In conclusion, the TBR-CM intervention does not lead to relatively improved psychiatric health outcomes. Further research is necessary to examine the efforts needed to extend increased treatment engagement into improved health outcomes for intervention recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Research algorithm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lefforge NL. Donohue B. Strada MJ. Improving session attendance in mental health and substance abuse settings: A review of controlled studies. Behav Ther. 2007;38:1–22. - PubMed
    1. Zanjani F. Mavandadi S. TenHave T. Katz I. Durai NB. Krahn D. Llorente M. Kirchner J. Olsen E. Van Stone W. Cooley S. Oslin DW. Longitudinal course of substance treatment benefits in older male veteran at-risk drinkers. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2008;63:98–106. - PubMed
    1. Bernstein E. Bernstein J. Levenson S. Project ASSERT: An ED-based intervention to increase access to primary care, preventive services, and the substance abuse treatment system. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30:181–189. - PubMed
    1. Donovan DM. Rosengren DB. Downey L. Cox GB. Sloan KL. Attrition prevention with individuals awaiting publicly funded drug treatment. Addiction. 2001;96:1149–1160. - PubMed
    1. Kitcheman J. Adams CE. Pervaiz A. Kader I. Mohandas D. Brookes G. Does an encouraging letter encourage attendance at psychiatric out-patient clinics? The Leeds PROMPTS randomized study. Psychol Med. 2008;38:717–723. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources