An examination of lifestyle and adjustment in three community residential alternatives

Abstract

Lifestyle normalization, community integration, adjustment, social support, and personal satisfaction were examined for 133 adults with mild and moderate retardation living in small group homes, supervised apartments, and with their natural families. Results of questionnaires and structured interviews with care providers showed that the residence settings supported quite different lifestyles with respect to independence, lifestyle normalization, and integration. Persons in supervised apartments achieved the most normative lifestyles with greater personal independence and community integration while reporting levels of lifestyle satisfaction and personal well-being similar to that of persons living with their own families. Results also showed that social integration, that is, participation in activities with peers without disabilities, was extremely limited for all participants, even those living in natural families. The study exemplifies the use of a residential typology to investigate the relationship of environmental factors to community adjustment. It also exemplifies the use of multiple perspectives and multiple measures to evaluate quality of life in community living alternatives.