Recruitment and training for home hemodialysis: experience and lessons from the Nocturnal Dialysis Trial
- PMID: 20576829
- PMCID: PMC2974402
- DOI: 10.2215/CJN.02440310
Recruitment and training for home hemodialysis: experience and lessons from the Nocturnal Dialysis Trial
Abstract
Background and objectives: We assessed perceived barriers and incentives to home hemodialysis and evaluated potential correlates with the duration of home hemodialysis training.
Design, settings, participants, & measurements: Surveys were sent to the principal investigator and study coordinator for each clinical center in the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Nocturnal Trial. Baseline data were obtained on medical comorbidities, cognitive and physical functioning, sessions required for home hemodialysis training, and costs of home renovations.
Results: The most commonly perceived barriers included lack of patient motivation, unwillingness to change from in-center modality, and fear of self-cannulation. The most common incentives were greater scheduling flexibility and reduced travel time. The median costs for home renovations varied between $1191 and $4018. The mean number of home hemodialysis training sessions was 27.7 +/- 10.4 (11-59 days). Average training time was less for patients with experience in either self-care or both self-care and cannulation. The number of training sessions was unrelated to the score on the Modified Mini Mental Status or Trailmaking B tests or patient's education level. Training time also did not correlate with the SF-36 Physical Function subscale but did with the modified Charlson comorbidity score and older patient age.
Conclusions: Lack of patient or family motivation and fear of the dialysis process are surmountable barriers for accepting home hemodialysis as a modality for renal replacement therapy. Formal education and scores on cognitive function tests are not predictors of training time.
Figures
Comment in
-
Hemodialysis treatment time: a fresh perspective.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Oct;6(10):2522-30. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00970211. Epub 2011 Sep 1. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011. PMID: 21885788
References
-
- USRDS: 2009 Annual Data Report, Bethesda, MD, Natonal Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2009
-
- Bayliss G, Danziger J: Nocturnal versus conventional haemodialysis: Some current issues. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24: 3612–3617, 2009 - PubMed
-
- Macgregor MS, Agar JW, Blagg CR: Home haemodialysis—international trends and variation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 1934–1945, 2006 - PubMed
-
- Woods JD, Port FK, Stannard D, Blagg CR, Held PJ: Comparison of mortality with home hemodialysis and center hemodialysis: a national study. Kidney Int 49: 1464–1470, 1996 - PubMed
-
- Culleton BF, Walsh M, Klarenbach SW, Mortis G, Scott-Douglas N, Quinn RR, Tonelli M, Donnelly S, Friedrich MG, Kumar A, Mahallati H, Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ: Effect of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on left ventricular mass and quality of life: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 298: 1291–1299, 2007 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
